Skip to main content

Pay Of Top GLC Executives: Adjusting Upward Or Downward


This is an interesting question. When the masters receive less, the servants under them should get less accordingly.  However, if the pay of the masters is based on a certain calculation of their servants’ pay, then the more the servants get the more the masters will be getting – this is another uniquely Singapore!  

This top to bottom approach will help ministers to get more if their servants in government linked companies (GLCs) are getting more. While if it is bottom to top approach, the base is so big, it is difficult to move the average of the bottom to increase the pay of the ministers. So, the easier way out is to use the top to bottom approach and the government can use the GLCs to achieve this goal.  

We are watching after the pay cuts for political positions, will there be any pay adjustment for top executives in the GLCs in Singapore? Will there be an upward trend so that to push up the average of the top 1000 earners in Singapore or will there be a downward trend as the political masters are getting less so that they have to be compensated less accordingly?

Top GLC executives are top earners

Many of the top listed companies are owned by Singapore government through mainly Temasek Holdings, for example, listed companies like Singtel, DBS, SIA, Keppel, Sembawang, CapitaLand etc. We all know that these top executives are drawing millions dollars salaries and bonuses. Even SMRT, the troubled train operator, its CEO are having a pay cheque higher than a junior minister.

We don’t know how many of the top 1000 earners in Singapore are top GLC executives.  But it is not a small number and they can contribute to move the average compensation of the top 1000 earners in Singapore. An increase in their pay will help to increase the average of the top 1000 earners; this will ultimately increase the pay of the ministers.    

Through Temasek and GLCs, it is possible to move up or down the average pay of the top earners in Singapore. Of course, in the name of market forces, it can remain unchanged but it will create a wider gap between GLC top executives and their political masters. Like one PAP MP had commented last year, it may belittle the ministers, as ministers who draw less pay will not have the courage to look up at these top executives.  Ministers cannot hold themselves high due to a bigger pay gap.  Perhaps, this MP can have a follow-up on this issue.

We are spending too much on the issue of political pay and we will not get the correct answer until general election comes. 

Singapore is greater than PAP


This is a PAP problem - getting calibre candidates to join them, but it will have to be decided by the voters of Singapore. And we must always realise that Singapore is greater than the PAP – It must always be the case, especially in future. Otherwise, we will not have a breakthrough, new peak and new direction.  Do we want to continue to remain at the ‘super first world pay for ministers and third world wages for the workers’?

For selfish or survival reasons, the PAP will try all the ways to remain in power. However, they are running out of innovative strategies, wills and spirit to fight on, just like the debate on political pay. 

It will not end here.  Perhaps, it is just the beginning like the sad cases of the chiefs of SCDF and CNB in the start of the dragon year.           
       
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more