Skip to main content

无心, 哪来减薪不减心。



那么,什么又是有心呢?当下周国会辩论政治薪金时,轮到陈硕茂发言时,我们才真正的看到有心,看到了服务和牺牲。看看一个在华尔街的顶尖律师,因为有心,而甘愿每月领取不到2万新元的津贴,他何苦要如此有心呢?

说的白一点,好多自认应该拿高薪的人,很可能会无地自容。他们的无心,选民可能还没有看到,但是,阿裕尼选民已经看到了,40%选民已经看到了。

心啊,性啊,理啊,单独看也可以,合起来看也可以,总之,表现出来的知行动作,就显出一个人的认知,良知或无知。因此,在讨论减薪不减心时,就要看一个人有没有这种认知和良知,如果是无知,那么即是无心,减薪不减心,根本不是问题的所在。

无心,何来减心。

有心,有认知,有良知,再配合行动,为新加坡的理念,理想而献身服务,那才有资格谈论减薪不减心。

行动无心,在野有意

这不是说行动党人没有实体上的心,而是,他们对有些事情,是有心的,对有些事情却是无心的。在国会辩论部长薪金时,行动党就搬出党督来,不论辩论的如何,最后还是要根据党的意愿,立场来投票,这是无心的改变。行动党议员是不可以违背党的立场,要必须随党督的指示而投票。

行动党这一路走来,像是一条变色龙,从左爬到右。当年,它是靠着下层群从的支持而上来的。它是以人民的行动作为依据,所以才叫做人民行动党。现在呢?好像只有行动而没有人民。因为,它服务的对象已经从左变到右了。这或许是无心之变吧!

当然,由于这个原因,行动党就渐渐的脱离群从,开始走向精英治国,离开了基本的物资需求,转向金钱,外国人才,外国劳工,外来投资,来寻求更高的回报,更多的薪金。所以,行动党的心,在人民这方面是从有心变为无心,而对它所谓的人才,投资者,外来资金,就变得特别的有心,特别的在意,深怕做的不够好,不够道地。

爱人变心了,人民怎么办?幸好,还有在野党,没有变心,依然爱着你。下次大选,选民可要认清这个事实,不要被变色龙的左右变法而弄得分不清黑白,投票给负心人。

无心例子,何其多

这里随便举几个例子,让人们看看什么是无心,有兴趣的人还可以自己再加几个:

无心1:关闭南大
据说南大一开始成立就注定失败,因此,它最后和新加坡大学合并,不是政府有心,而是无心的无言的结局。

无心2:华文命运
因为家长选择英文源流的学校,政府也是没有办法,顺其自然,华文难学,我们也是没有办法的啊!这是无心的自然发展。

无心3:地铁站重复名字
因为根本没人发现错误,一直到开门见客前,才发现乌龙。不知是无人管,还是,看不懂华文,拖到最后一分钟才来改华文站名。这也是无心之过吧!

无心4:总统最酷
孩子们真的好无心啊! 他们竟然把总统这么神圣的高贵的职位,当成是一份领高薪,不做事的优差。不要介意,这是孩子的戏言,无心的。

无心5:新钞缺货
跑了几趟银行,就是换不到新钞,不知是银行进货不够,还是金融管理局出货不多,总之,我们无心让你跑多几趟,只是你运气不好。

无心6:水淹乌节
我们真的很无辜,这50年一遇的洪水,乌节一带当然会淹水啦。这是天降的祸水,我们无能为力。

无心7:水淹变水池
我们已经做好防水的准备,但是,大厦内的积水不退,变成水池,不是我们的错,我们无心防备你们大夏内的积水,我们只管外面,里面我们无心服务。

无心8:静山震撼
披上闪电的白衣白裤还以为一定的自然的会中选,无心准备,当然会有如此巨大的震撼。幸好,现在溜到总理的安全区了。我是无心无意逃避的。

无心9:逃马事件
真的好无心啊!一个跛脚的人,怎能爬窗逃出保安如此周密的拘留所。还漂洋过海到彼岸去。这个罪就由无心看门的守卫去负责吧!

无心10:部长薪金
无心过渡透明,如果年年公开收入多少,花红多少,奖励多少,那么,我们如何保住本身的私隐。我们是无心的,不是样样事情都可以公开的。


Comments

  1. ~无心7:水淹变水池
    我们已经做好防水的准备,但是,大厦内的积水不退,变成水池,不是我们的错,我们无心防备你们大夏内的积水,我们只管外面,里面我们无心服务。~
    根据专家的说法,PUB 有沟渠系统水流数据,却没地面因地形变化水流动的数据,也就是说 。。。
    外面也管不好。

    market2garden / clarinet2concerto / op2torch

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...