看看在野党新候选人的资历， PAP独揽人才的时代已经结束。接着就是看一党独大会不会被终结。您说呢！

看看在野党新候选人的资历，

PAP独揽人才的时代已经结束。

接着就是看一党独大会不会被终结。

您说呢！

令人亮眼的工人党14位新候选人，应该给予一个赞！前进党和民主党也有两、三位新的优秀候选人。和以往的大选相比，PAP的新候选人，不但没有突出，反而有些根本就是塔顺风车。

集选区的目的，原本就是保护少数族群，确保他们有一定的代表。发展到今天，竟然沦落到连PAP华族候选人，那些不具资格者，也能够利用顺风车进入国会。这是开倒车，无形中影响整体PAP议员的素质。

以上两个发展趋势，证明PAP已经完全失去主导国家精英，垄断国家未来优秀接班人的大局。优秀候选人，愿意牺牲，贡献国家，为国效力，站在在野党，尤其是工人党，已经是一个无法抗拒的时代潮流。

选民应该认可这一新的政治格局，新的发展，并且给予大力支持。如果继续认为只有闪电才能保证新加坡的未来，那么，将是大错特错。因为，连李显龙也不得不承认，PAP没有，也不可能垄断所有的好建议，好政策。因此，制衡力量必须强化，让更多在野党议员进入国会。

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy. However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012. 2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP? Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP? Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes. And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog