过去五年做了什么？王瑞杰应不应该有第二次机会？从王瑞杰身上折射出来，我们又看到行动党做了什么？

过去五年做了什么？

王瑞杰应不应该有第二次机会？

从王瑞杰身上折射出来，

我们又看到行动党做了什么？

王瑞杰空降东海岸集选区，以未来总理的态势，成功为行动党守土，选民给他一个机会，让他有所表现。结果呢！他的东海岸计划怎么样啦？总理梦也没有了！

姑息东海岸计划，姑息王瑞杰的无所作为，是对民主的讽刺。明明有忠诚替代声音，明明有更好的选择，白白浪费五年；选民应该给改变一个机会。起来，加入改变，加速前进，铁锤换闪电。

你给王瑞杰多五年的机会，他还能做出什么贡献？

他能提出替代方案吗？不能。

他还能继续担任副总理吗？这个机会应该留给第四代，而不是介于第三和第四代之间的王瑞杰。

他还能做出什么贡献？东海岸计划版本2？看不出来，他在未来政府中能够扮演什么角色？一个过气的部长，是时候让他退休了。

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy. However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012. 2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP? Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP? Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes. And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog