Skip to main content

新次序、新经济架构出现， 新加坡难道不需要新的政治结构吗？

 新次序、新经济架构出现，

新加坡难道不需要新的政治结构吗？


你说，PAP是不是有一点像特朗普，川普？

特朗普的话，就要还手？

川普的话，任由打压？


国家可以顺从，但是世界人民可以反对，不买美国产品，如加拿大人不买美国货。同样的新加坡选民也可以选择如何定义特朗普，川普。不同定义会选出不同的代表，结果就是制衡的强或弱。


世界在变，国外局势在变，新的格局，新的挑战提早来临。过去60年的新加坡政治格局，难道不需要与时并进？依然一党独大吗？跟何况，PAP接班人一代不如一代。


看到外面在变，内部不需调整吗？以内部团结、全民共同前进，政府会照顾人民为诱饵，企图鱼目困珠，在大选制造不稳定，局势未明，来给一党独大加持，固本，增加政治资本。过去如此，现在更加露骨。


一党独大可否维护新加坡人的利益？回顾60年，这是不是改变的最佳时候、选择？特朗普的一意孤行，反映在PAP身上，就如：选区划分，你能不能说No吗？只可以默默接受HDB,。更正指示，你是假新闻，你怎么反驳？几时大选，也轮不到你说话？HDB, GST, 水税，你能反对加价吗？


我们看到了特朗普对世界造成的伤害，却无能为力。即使美国对新加坡有顺差，也课10%。当一个人的权力过大，产出的伤害更大，你放心让PAP一党独大下去吗？你害怕前路茫茫，没有靠山，但是把前途让一个绰绰逼人，没有同情心，同理心的人来操控，你放心吗？


选民有权决定如何定义特朗普或者川普。选择特朗普和川普，结局不一样哦！制衡的力度也不一样哦！三思喔！

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more