Skip to main content

新航有难,国家倾全力相助。 新航赚钱,有没有知恩图报?

 新航有难,国家倾全力相助。

新航赚钱,有没有知恩图报?


新航客机遇到严重乱流,政府动用所有可能的资源,倾全力协助。就像在冠病期间,政府也动用财政力量,全力为新航解困。新航的成功,有国家力量作为靠山,加持下得以度过重重难关。


新航是新加坡的面子,新加坡人的光荣。在某一方面,它其实也是人民行动党政府的表现指标。国家政府的大力扶持,支持,为它提供各种设备、基建,内外联系,新航才能取得今天的成绩。不过,这张皇牌似乎越来越不给力。


先不要说新航有没有知恩图报,新航在国际上面对的的竞争, 已经越来越严峻。与此同时,新航的服务,和以前相比,给人一种不如从前的感觉。这好像是PAP政府的写照,服务不如从前,初心不如以前,但是,却要人民无条件支持,因为新航不可以倒,人民行动党不可以倒。


新航有没有知恩图报?PAP有没有知恩图报?对于员工和股东,对于部长和高级公务员,或许有。但是,这个小幅度的知恩图报,却是建立在国家的基础上,利用国家资源才取得的成就。对于大多数新加坡人,却是一种无感。无感之后,会出现什么结果,不得而知?


新航好不好,就像问PAP好不好?这种联想是否能够持续?人民行动党、工会、政联公司,如新航、政府这些过去顺理成章的命运共同体,有没有可能出现脱钩?老一辈国人,习惯这种联想,这种安排,甚至走进投票站,只懂得闪电,是否能够持续不断下去?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...