Skip to main content

李显龙留给黄循财一个 “资本运作,无钱不行的新加坡”。

 李显龙留给黄循财一个

“资本运作,无钱不行的新加坡”。


李显龙说过,超级富豪,超过10亿身家的人才能创造就业机会。因此,我们需要吸引他们,为我国贡献工作机会。这其实就是资本运作,有钱就有投资、工作,无钱什么都不行。


同样的道理,我们的主权基金,也财大气粗,能够创造就业机会。这种垄断式资本运作的结果造就财富高度集中在1%、10%人手中。演变成社会不平衡,贫富悬殊。的确,几十年经济发展下来,越来越多人感觉跟不上,薪金没有增加,开销却没有减少。


20年的李显龙总理任期,经济的确大有成长。但是,这套钱生钱的资本运作,对于中下层的人来说,却是看到蛋糕,吃不到蛋糕。我们看不到黄循财如何跳出这个模式,他只能鼓励国人,往非物质发展,钱生钱的玩意,只适合国内外的有钱人,有资本的公司。


百万元的组屋,甚至开价两百万元的组屋,已经成了常态,对于收人固定,打工为生的新加坡人来说,要想回到以往的‘居者有其屋’的理想,很可能必须牺牲其他物质方面的开支,才能完成拥屋梦,而且组屋面积越来越小。

整个公积金的运作,税务,消费税,医疗,教育,国防等,都是资本运作,人民负担消费税,公积金,而后国家进行分配、投资、运作,没有钱,什么都不行。


因此,羊毛出在羊身上,谁是羊,超级富豪?主权基金?外来人才?洗钱团伙?投机分子?还是,善良的老百姓?百万组屋对于有钱人来说,不算什么,但是,对于普通人,那可是天价,要用多少年才能完成拥屋梦?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...