Skip to main content

A Changed Malaysia, different values!


Malaysia has a new government, ending 61 years rule of Barisan Nasional.  

A changed Malaysia means different values - majority agreed to have more democracy, justice, free and fair. While there is also a strong showing of religious values and regional rights.    

The new Pakatan Harapan federal government will have to deal with these different values, a long overdue correction of the past mistakes of BN. Ironically, some mistakes are also contributed by the new prime minister, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad whose 22-year rule further divided the society, races and even the relationship with the rulers.

Thanks God Najib’s race card, money politics, goodies, have all failed. His corrupted values and principals are rejected by Malaysians. Najib, as prime minister, has the strength as he can use the state machinery freely.   

While as Laozi pointed out, Najib fails to see the true and real power as he does not master himself well. Najib is not acting from his heart. His mind is full of strength but without heart understanding of the people - their sufferings, poverty, cost of living, fair distribution, and even rule of laws.

Najib also downgrades Malaysia international standing as Malaysian Official Number One. He fails to master himself.

He creates and promote sub-standard values, far away from the founding Malaysia’s values and principals. Malaysians see his kleptocratic BN government no different from corrupted third world countries.

A change is a challenge. Malaysians wants a change and look forward for a better tomorrow.

Congratulations to Malaysia, Malaysians, all the best!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...