Skip to main content

行动党的任性问题,谁来决定?你会让它任性下去吗?


【SG50过后,行动党还有机会任性吗?新加坡选民还会让行动党任性下去吗?】


任性,最近成了中国的一个流行语。习近平说了经济任性的问题。李克强谈了权力任性的问题。柴静更提出环保的任性问题。改革开放,把经济拉上,中国的总体经济量即将成为世界第一位。任性发展的同时,当然也带来了一连串的任性问题。任性的后遗症应该如何处理呢?


中国共产党很明显已经看到了任性的严重后果,因此,不得不自我提出任性问题,提出解决任性问题的方法。任性后遗症如果解决不了,很可能政权也会被任性掉。


在新加坡,人民行动党有没有看到自己的任性问题呢?新加坡人民是否感觉到行动党的任性问题,发现行动党政策任性的后遗症呢?当然,问题的关键和重点更是选民会不会继续给予行动党多一次任性的机会?让它继续任性下去。行动党当然希望能够像SG50那样,再来一次50年的任性,忽悠人民多50年。


50年的行动党任性,我们看到很多后遗症。再来一个50年的连续任性,人民受得了吗?


一党独大是任性问题的根源

新加坡独立50年来,根本就没有人能够对行动党的任性提出制衡,制约。只要发出一点不同的声音,就有倒霉下场。在这种垄断政治的环境下,行动党不任性才怪。但是,行动党任性的结果,就是要付出代价--失去民心,失去选票。


【任性取得高经济成长,任性的贫富差距,任性的践踏民主,任性的部长高薪,任性的选择性透明。。。】


行动党有什么任性的事情,任性的问题,导致新加坡人不满。50年来,追求大蛋糕的经济政策,行动党怎么可能不任性的做了一些对令人民不满的事情。行动党在人口政策上任性,在教育政策上任性,在公积金问题上任性,在储备,淡马锡,政府投资公司的透明度上任性,在媒体开放上任性,在劳资政三方面任性,几乎可以说社会,政治,经济,方方面面都做到任性。


行动党任性了50年,新加坡人已经不能再容忍这些无所不在的,各方各面的任性了。


2011年,大选投票前,行动党放下身段,放下小姐霸气,如果行动党有做得不好的地方,希望选民原谅。但是,说一套,做一套,行动党继续任性,提出人口政策,根本没有体会人民的感受。对于社交媒体的监控也没有放松。对于新闻自由,言论自由,集会权利,也同样的没有放松。


现在,大选即将来临,行动党却搬出另外一套任性。任性的SG50庆祝,任性的叫人国庆长假不要出国,任性的给国人发红包,任性的公积金新政策,任性的医药保健措施,任性的学习基金,任性的罗宾汉,任性的。。。。


总之,国会里面和外面,行动党在一党独大下,可以继续的任性。行动党议员可以任性的出席,也可以任性的不出席国会会议。讨论国家大事的辩论,可以任性的参加,也可以任性的 不参加。国会外赚钱容易,行动党议员可以任性的到国会外面担任董事或者高管,来赚外快。有几次,国会还出现,议员人数没有达到法定人数的任性问题。


归根结蒂就是没有人监督行动党,国会内外的一党独大,导致行动党可以任性的做行动党要做的事情。而主流媒体,对行动党言听计从,放纵放任行动党的任性行为,难怪,新加坡的新闻自由排名,自我放任,任性的和第三世界国家齐名。

行动党任性50年的后果,就是人民要收回行动党任性的权利。任性的权利来至人民,已经有越来越多的人觉得不能够再让行动党任性下去。你认为如何?是否应该让行动党继续任性下去,问一问自己受得了吗?想想,还是快快收回任性的权利,不再放任行动党,还政于民。

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...