Skip to main content

行动党最爱的人伤行动党最深


行动党最喜欢强调外来人才的重要,强调他们对新加坡的贡献,哪里知道最后却被这些人出卖了。这种出卖行为,如果没有社交媒体,就很可能不了了之,大事化小小事化无,主流媒体也懒得跟进,我们想想看,在没有社交媒体的时代,这样的新闻能够见报吗?

安顿·凯西(Anton Casey)只是在面簿上留言,羞辱地铁搭客为贫穷人,看不懂德士师傅的行为,还投诉要把身上因为搭公交的恶臭洗掉,就能正常过活了。搭地铁的人占人口的大多数,得罪了这些人,就是和自己的选票过不去。因此,行动党不得不出动部长来批评凯西,尽量把这种出卖行为的伤害减到最少。

是谁让凯西的嚣张行为膨胀?是谁让凯西拿了好处,还反过来咬了行动党一口?这是行动党最伤心的地方。行动党自己最清楚,自己精心制造出这么多高薪职位,把这些外来人才引进,就是希望他们好吃好住开得上跑车,不要牵涉到本地人的事物,社交圈子也在上流社会之间,不要和本地人有太多的接触。

哪里知道,事情都是会出现状况,跑车需要维修,不得不坐一回地铁。不幸的是只坐一次地铁,就把行动党给出卖了。害得尊贵的凯西要为自己和孩子消毒,防止地铁搭客的恶臭长留他们身上。我们的地铁服务真的好可怜啊!今年已经发生4次停车事故,现在,还要背上传播恶臭的罪名。

看来在小印度事件后,行动党的禁酒圈地范围要进一步扩大,不只是低薪的外劳需要管制,限制他们在一定范围喝酒,一定范围娱乐休息的双规外,对外来人才,也要进行双规:只准在高档的地方出入,只准私人的交通服务(怪动作的德士服务不准)。

这样一来,外劳不会和外来人才接触,当然他们也不会和本地人接触,因此,形成一国三制。前两者没有投票权,因此,把他们隔离开,不与本地人接触,就会减少摩擦,国人的不满也会减少。小小的新加坡真的能够一国三制吗?

行动党这么爱惜外来人才,现在却要对他们进行双规,真的有点说不过去。但是,回头想一想,得到好处的既得利益者,会是这么想吗?他们在美酒加咖啡后,会感恩行动党给他们这个发财机会吗?行动党的痛,就是痛在这里,那些得到好处的高薪者,最好不要发言,不然就会得罪选民。现在是行动党这任政府的中期,如果继续有人出卖行动党,后果就是不堪设想。但是,只要社交媒体存在,面簿推特在,犯错的机会多得是,行动党能够防得了吗?

凯西的言行,不论在东方还是西方,都是行不通的。问题是为何他不对英国地铁的恶臭有所表示,而对有恩于他的新加坡地铁有所怨言,是不是行动党把这些人给宠坏了,让他们得以如此的嚣张。行动党现在才感受到被这些人出卖,是不是太迟了呢!在西方的资本主义社会,政客们都知道一人一票,贫穷人占了大数,任何人得罪贫穷人,就不用中选。但是作为外来人才,既得利益者,凯西就没有行动党的政治压力,他不需要为行动党的政治资本着想。凯西得罪了选民,他一家人可以远走高飞,可是行动党不行,除非行动党的头头也跟凯西一样,也想在领了高薪后,可以远走高飞,那行动党就不需要理地铁恶臭的后续问题。

地铁频频出现问题,已经深深的影响了行动党政府的诚信,效率问题。小印度又出现外劳问题,再加上凯西影射出来的外来人才问题,看来我们的人口政策需要一个更加深入的思考,而不是单单690万人这个简单的指导方针。


建国50年,需要新点子来庆祝,如果交通,保安,组屋,社会问题没有解决,社交媒体又加大管制,多些新规定,我们还会有心情想新点子吗?更为重要的是,凯西会是最后一个出卖行动党的人吗? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...