Skip to main content

无言的结局,竟然反”将”行动党,何时补选?



事实难料,刚说完工人党除了沉默外,没有其他选择,哪里知道,不鸣则已,一鸣惊人。饶欣龙的无言的结局,竟然换来被开除的命运,成了龙年我国政坛第一条消失的龙。

因为,工人党不能为了一个人,而牺牲整个党,牺牲在野党的利益,和在野势力在新加坡的成长。

后港区现在是没有议员了。目前,暂时由工人党来代管。到底代管到几时,就要由行动党来做决定了,总理, 您准备好了吗?几时面对后港选民,几时补选,几时是您的黄金时间,这粒球现在已经在您的脚下,如何踢,就看您怎么出招了。

工人党有错在先,现在已经做出道歉,到底后港选民愿意不愿意原谅工人党,不是总理,部长,或者是行动党说了算了,后港选民的选票才是一个指标。

工人党做出这个创新加坡历史的记录,让一位现任议员失去议员资格,不可不说是沉痛的决定,做出这样决定的党领袖,很可能比失去议员资格的人更加痛苦,伤心。如果去年阿裕尼集选区失败,再加上后港补选失败,工人党不是什么根据地都没有了吗?选民的信赖,不是一朝一夕就能建立起来的,而面对补选,不一定就能取得胜利。

这个决定可以说是一鸣惊人,想都想不到,行动党,其他在野党,政论人士,没有人会想到这个结果。这个结局,对工人党来说,换回来更高的道德准则,更高的透明度和公开性。当然,这样一来,行动党就被动多了。“将”到总理只能说国事繁忙,没有空处理。

到底几时补选? 可快,可慢,也可以是无,没有补选。这粒球现在就在行动党龙门前,就看行动党如何出招解围。现在离下次大选还有一段时间,不及时举行补选,对我国的民主制度是极为不利的。一般上,只有在害怕失去自己原有的选区,才会害怕补选,后港即是工人党拥有的旧选区,行动党根本没有失去任何选区,为何害怕补选呢?

因此,这反而显示出工人党的自信,有信心重新拿回后港单选区,直接面对后港选民的责问,批评和向选民认错。而行动党迟迟不做决定,反而让人觉得没有大将之风,一点失败都经受不起。更大的问题将是被看成是阻碍民主进程的绊脚石。时间拖得越长,对行动党更为不利。

最好的方法是速战速决,输赢对行动党的国会大多数,没有影响,反而更能专心治国,不用再理工人党内部的问题。不要为了短期的错误决定,而坏了行动党的长期利益。今天,人民对民主的要求,已经跟从前有很大的不同,行动党对补选一事,沉默是金,不加理睬,肯定不是最佳的选择。

Comments

  1. WP已进阶入下围棋(为取势而愿意被吃掉一两子的全局策略)的水平,
    已不是那些还在下中国/国际象棋(只顾着吃子或推测两三步棋的局部策略)的政党或政评者能预料到的。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...