急流勇退，识时务者为俊杰？ ‘南郭先生’拜登的最后一里路？

急流勇退，识时务者为俊杰？

‘南郭先生’拜登的最后一里路？

拜登任期还没有结束，美国就出现一系列的败象。走到现在，拜登已经让美国和民主党陷入失败的困局。即使现在退选，也不是急流勇退，因为，他早早就应该退了。

他更加不是识时务者为俊杰。俊杰的做法，就是在事情还没有失去控制时，就做出正确的选择，让民主党有机会，做出对应的策略，及早优选候选人。留给民主党的时间不多，不够，现在看来似乎武林只有特朗普一人。

拜登可以说是美国历史上，从政最长的人之一。如果认真看，他似乎像南郭先生，滥竽充数，忽悠选民，忽悠民主党，忽悠国家几十年。一旦成为总统，必须做出重要决定，他依旧忽悠，从军事，经济，外交多方面看，美国的好牌都出光了，结果却令人失望。

像美国这样的超级大国，竟然能够不断的出现忽悠人民的政客，而且忽悠时间之长，令人不敢相信。美国具有良好的政治、民主机制，为何不能避免忽悠发生。南郭先生在最后一刻，落荒而逃。拜登恐怕连这个机会都没有。这已经不是退不退的问题，而是忽悠的根深蒂固，如何再度伟大？

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy. However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012. 2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP? Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP? Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes. And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog