How does Lawrence Wong see Ting Pei Ling? Asset or Liability?

How does Lawrence Wong see

Ting Pei Ling?

Asset or Liability?

From Grab to DCS to MetaCamp within a short time period, how Singporeans see Ting Pei Ling’s job opportunities? Can young Singaporeans suka suka change jobs as they wish? Do young Singaporeans really enjoy plenty of jobs offered?

Lawrence Wong, as the chief PAP leader responsible for the coming general election, will have to think carefully whether Ting is an asset or a liability? It is right to field young and potential candidates. However, Ting is the most controversial young PAP MP so far.

Will she be fielded again? How does Lawrence Wong see Ting? Added value or minus points? Lawrence Wong wants to attract young voters, and wants to build up his ‘friends of the PAP’. What will young Singaporeans feel when comparing job opportunities with Ting Pei Ling?

Oh! Not everyone is born equal. Some have good starting points. Some people know someone. Some are associated with someone. No wonder Lawrence is promoting his new definition of success, far far away from the Swiss standard of living.

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By inserting a single c

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog