Skip to main content

PAP的信心赤字,大选前来得及修补吗?

 PAP的信心赤字,大选前来得及修补吗?


当前的世界局势,人民对于政治人物的信任度很低。当然,PAP说自己独善其身,不受影响,提出调查数据证明PAP深得民心。真的如此,哪来信心赤字?


新的选举官即将上任,是不是一种转运手段?还是,对于选举,PAP是信心满满,换政府是不可能发生。因此,信心赤字从何而来?有何修补的必要?况且,撒钱已经满足了大部分人的信心回流。


真的没有信心赤字吗?真的没有贫富悬殊,差距越来越大的信心危机吗?当新加坡人辛苦越堤前往新山消费,是不是对于本地通货膨胀的忧心?这种现象一直创造新的高点,到底代表什么?


PAP有没有修补信心危机的动作?最近的几宗司法案件,和信心修补有关吗?如果撒钱不够的话,最后关头,还是可以加码的。新的领导班子的确需要修补信心赤字。 泰勒丝来了又走了,是否提高年轻人对PAP的的信心、观感?反对以色列大使馆的中东言论,危害本地的和谐,加分还是减分?


亿万富豪带来工作机会,很不幸带来更多低薪机会。富豪买豪宅,从中得利的却是像马宝山这样的前部长和其他以前用相对低价购买地产的人。这些人有套利机会,一般人很少有这种巨大利益的机会。可负担的组屋,对于年轻一代,真的是可负担得起吗?信得过吗?


信心赤字其实跟经济有关。尤其是所谓的西方发达经济体,如果领袖无法给人们带来经济红利,面对选举就变成信心赤字。应该说,不单信心赤字,领袖素质的赤字,更加令人担心。新加坡不期待未来几年出现高增长,因此,财富的公平分配,税务的分担,就成了信心的指标。如果PAP觉得没有问题,人民却出现相反观感,信心赤字、危机就出现了。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...