Skip to main content

新加坡以前赌中国输,现在不可以赌中国衰弱。

 新加坡以前赌中国输,现在不可以赌中国衰弱。


黄循财去了一趟中国,回来后似乎也配合中国的口吻,不可以赌中国衰弱,其实,跟习近平说的也差不多,不要赌中国输。黄循财还强调,永远不要押注中国衰弱。这个“永远”,到底是与时并进,还是自打嘴巴?


那么,为什么几十年前,新加坡会豪赌中国输?1980年终结南洋大学以及华校。40多年前,豪赌中文必败,华文无用,当然也意味中国不可能崛起。现在,听到不可以赌中国衰弱,的确很讽刺。或许,行动党的精英不是不懂历史,就是迷信西方永远强大


当然,这笔账不可以算在黄循财身上,况且,到底能不能当上总理,连他自己也不知道。回答海峡记者的提问时,他也说不清楚,这是不是他第一次和最后一次主持副总理级别的新中双边合作联合委员会。


华校生曾经被笑成中国直升机 Chinese helicopter。当年,根本没有想象到直升机竟然发展成了无人机。 或许,几十年后的今天,当大疆无人机,行销全球,用无人的角度,看着新加坡的时候,才发现新加坡其实很短视。


新加坡的短视,是否只是局限在这里?行动党只看到有人操作的直升机,而忽略了无人也可以操控飞机。黄循财短短几个月,连续走访了中美两国,在美国,他强调,美国是新加坡的安全和国防支柱。在中国,不赌中国衰弱,是不是指经济方面的支柱?例如:数位人民币?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...