费解？上诉费和杂费。为何盛港市镇会要付多于阿裕尼-后港市镇会。

费解？上诉费和杂费。

为何盛港市镇会要付多于阿裕尼-后港市镇会。

新加坡上诉庭最终判决，盛港和阿裕尼-后港市镇会在上诉案中败诉。因此，需要负责支付对方的上诉费用。败诉赔钱是当然的，问题是为何盛港市镇会要付出这么多。

在整个上诉案中，阿裕尼-后港市镇会才是主体。因为，这个市镇会的阿裕尼集选区-五个选区和后港单选区都涉及在内。而盛港集选区，只有前榜鹅东单选区，现为盛港集选区的一部分，牵涉在内。

榜鹅东单选区，无论怎么大，人怎么多，都不可能超过一个集选区。费解？在上诉费和杂费开支上，为什么盛港集选区要付出多于阿裕尼-后港市镇会？

在费解中，让人牵出不少联想，幻想，逻辑何在？我们在新闻中看不到案件的两方的解释。媒体也不进一步报道。或许，新加坡人已经习惯了，费解归费解，问了也是白问。

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy. However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012. 2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP? Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP? Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes. And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog