I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
Current affairs 时事
“似乎也走着美国的方向和策略” -- 这句话让人发噱。诙谐的地方就是竟然敢敢的和美国并列 -- 要知道美国的两党是你方唱罢我登场,好不好是另一个问题,主要就是都有能力轮流在“坐庄”!
ReplyDelete新加坡那么几个蚊子党一选举就来凑热闹不说。比较有点儿能量的工人党也仅是想做副手做“B”队。而民主党大势已去。而陈清木先生来势汹汹,却是宝刀已老。
新加坡的政治窘境,就是只有执政党的一条船。这艘船怎样破旧简陋,只要不沉,就没有人会傻傻的跳海。新加坡的在野党如果不能够想通这点,殚精竭力的先组织同盟来对付共同的敌人 -- 那么一切的努力不过就是狗吠火车罢了。