Skip to main content

From Systematic bias against minorities, Systematic bias against Chinese educated persons. To Systematic bias against Singaporeans The bias keeps on expanding and only a United Singaporean Front can solve it.


From systematic bias against minorities and  Chinese educated persons to systematic bias against Singaporeans, these are the wonderful achievements under the PAP government. The former is under Lee Kuan Yew and the latter under Lee Hsien Loong. 


Considering finance and investment, in LKY’s era, the systematic bias is more towards unsystematic risk  (target or specific). While under LHL, the systematic bias has become a systematic risk (across the board). 

 

Malay cannot hold some positions in the army. Indian cannot become the prime minister and Chinese educated person, like Ong Teng Cheong also cannot become the prime minister as his English is not good enough. 


Even the 4G, the PAP also has their standard operation procedure for who is in who is out. Runway is too short so Heng is out.  Minorities are out too as we are not ready for a non-Chinese PM.  


You may think of the presidential election. Who is in and who is out, all depend on the PAP-controlled parliament. They can do whatever things they want.  Is this a legal, institutionalised and structured way of bias? 


The root cause is INEQUALITY？？？Growth???  




Even as a majority race in Singapore, you can see Chinese is against Chinese. From the early days of dialect base infighting to Chinese vs English educated persons, to the local and foreign born Chinese. ???


Systematic bias against Singaporeans???


We allow some employment and recruitment practices against Singaporeans.  We allow high-risk Covid-19 visitors to enter Singapore. We only allow Singaporeans for National Service. Oh! We also provide scholarships and university places for foreigners. 


Whether you are a majority or minorities in Singapore, with the PAP’s population and immigration policy, we will soon become minorities in our own land.


Hence, we have to redefine and broaden the definition of Singapore core.



We are in the same boat as described in the PAP’s slogan of 2011 GE.  Securing Our Future Together 同舟共济。



同舟共济 means we are in the same boat, having the same fate, regardless of race, language or religions. In 2011, the PAP said we had to work together to secure our future.  Really? The PAP seems to divide Singaporeans further under Lee Hsien Loong and his un-schedule, parliament-approved systematic bias against Singaporeans. 


唇齿相依 Chinese and non-Chinese Singaporeans are like lips and teeth.  Sometimes, the teeth might bite the lips by accident but all belong to your body.  We should look beyond our lips and teeth to emerge stronger.     





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more