Skip to main content

[任人唯贤】渐行渐远是 PAP 后新冠的新常态。

老爸光耀 
儿子不孝


无料的人随意当总统,有料的的人当不了总理。这是2015年大选,强力委托PAP做政府的怪现象。


善达曼的能与不能,不是人民决定的。善达曼的才与不才,是人民行动党小圈圈决定的。在新加坡,决定一个人是否有才能,是PAP做最后决定。总理和副总理认为,善达曼,非华人,不可以做总理,不可以担任这个重要职位。虽然知识界一般认可善达曼,认为他可以胜任。而选民,一般人也认为,他可以担任总理职位。


能与不能,取决于PAP的小圈圈。即使善达曼也无法决定自己的命运。一个有料的能人都无法在行动党高唱‘任人唯贤’歌声中,决定自己的前途命运,一般人当然就更加无法确定依靠本身努力,是否就一定会得到相应的职位。


总理职位如此,总统职位也是如此。PAP小圈圈可以随意更改法令、宪法来满足小圈圈的既得利益和目标。这个小圈圈当然也可以修法, 动不动,随意动用国库、公积金。 重要人事任命的变更,也可以依据小圈圈心意来进行。


不孝子担任总理10多年,已经背弃‘任人唯贤’的立国原则。如果再让不孝子强大委托,高票连任,新常态意味着,一党独大的PAP将远离‘任人唯贤’,小圈圈的权力。一意孤行,毫无顾忌,善达曼即使有才,也无能为力。总统无料,却可以轻易直通上位。


后新冠时代,对于新加坡人来说,不只是国际局势不明,经济急需改革,在政治上,如果PAP获得强大委托,那将是一场灾难。我们已经看到小圈圈的不讲理、霸道,强大委托就是让不孝子获得为所欲为的权力。难怪,儿子不孝,光耀老爸。重演宫廷剧,小圈圈干政乱政,将是PAP 后新冠的新常态。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...