Skip to main content

Cry, sad and worry after reading “I’ve never liked the Workers’ Party“ #



Labels:

Comments

  1. 花非花4 April 2020 at 10:19

    这是网上视频看到的故事。一个移民加拿大的华人，因为感觉遭遇到了歧视，就有了组织政党的意念。然而当他将申请书呈交之后，迟迟不得回答。他不心死，就连续的申请，直到有了一次近距离的面试。

    让他想不到的是，官员开门见山，直接的就问他你要成立政党，是不是要“推翻”政府。他就说没有，只是想要为民服务，得到一个发声的管道罢了。想不到这个官员竟然这么说：“那你应该去申请组织一个社团啊什么会啊服务社会就好了。”

    他当时就听懂了官员言下之意，你如果不是对现任政府不满意，组织政党干什么呢？吃饱了撑着了吗？结果，他当然就成功的注册了一个政党，也参选了选举。

    成立政党就是明摆着要和现任政府对着“干”。如果像刘程强一样要做“副手”协助执政党，理念相同，倒不如直接加入P A P好了。记得饶欣龙当年说过他把选票投给P A P吗？这和刘程强的说话其实如出一辙。试想，明目张胆的告诉选民，工人党未来20年都没有“执政”能力，难道要人民和工人党一起“玩”家家酒吗？

    我的感觉，这一次的选举，或许就是工人党的生死关头。如果工人党不懂得“自爱“，拿出魄力和前进党、民主党等等组织联盟，在“尽出”所有政党的“菁英”而且“保证”国会不会过半，新加坡还不会“翻船”的话，那么每到选举就“狗吠火车”的游戏，新加坡所有中间选民早已经“厌”透了。

    忠言逆耳，冒昧之处，请见谅！

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more