Skip to main content

Comments

  1. 如果以为「政治」就是什么东西都可以上岗上线的话,那么新加坡的在野党就把人民的「智慧」看得太低了。

    无论什么时候,向付出劳力的劳动者「致敬」都是应该的。但是,在对「外来移工」表示敬意的时候,千万千万也不要忘记了有许多新加坡人和他们一样都站在自己的「岗位」上为这个国家、为自己默默的奉献。

    所以,这样「突兀」的「致敬」是想要表达什么「意思」呢?别忘了还有许许多多不是「外劳」的新加坡劳动人民。况且,想想看,有哪一个国家可以像新加坡一样,在隔离的时候还要由新加坡人民负担起彼等的生活、医疗费用,甚至薪酬也得照给。

    我不反对在「人道」上给予移工适当的关怀。我反对「见缝插针」的政治破坏。在野党在这个时候强调「工人宿舍」的敏感问题,本来应该就是在平常时期的话题。但是,在这个人心惶惶的时候,不啻就是「火上浇油」,激起「移工」的情绪。要知道,「人性」是盲从的,在绝对需要适当安抚百万外劳的可能躁动、感觉不安全的非常时期,在野党千万千万不要以为得到撄取政治利益的机会。而是应该和执政党通力合作,帮助国家、协助人民度过这个世纪难关。

    想象如果「疫情」在宿舍大爆发的结果,我就会「不寒而栗」!那时候,就算是出动新加坡全部军警,会有什么样场面都不难以想象。

    因此,我希望在这个艰难的时刻,新加坡的在野党能够发表支持政府努力「抗疫」的声明。当然,如果能够提供更好的应付「疫情」的政策,那么人民将会谨记在心头的。

    「恨铁不成钢」,还是一样的冒昧,请见谅。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...