I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
“来临的大选，选民当然可以继续选择保护P A P。但是，一个没有受到严峻挑战的P A P，是不是新加坡人的最佳选择？” --
ReplyDelete1，选民在保护P A P？这句话真“幽默”。因为我总是觉得新加坡选民是被P A P绑架了。
2，一个没有受到严峻挑战的P A P？这个问题问得好！关键就是应该由在野党来“回答”！在政治理论上，只有在野党去“挑战”执政党的。如果P A P没有受到“严峻”的挑战，这就表示在野党太松散了。
3， 是不是新加坡人的最佳选择？这句话“问”得有点儿奇怪。也看不出有什么逻辑？如果真有可以“选择”，那么愿赌服输，游戏的规矩既然是这样，那么大家就得尊重“选择”的结果。新加坡在野党没有反思自己为什么一直得不到大部份人民的“青睐”，反而回头“质疑”人民这才是最大的败笔！