Skip to main content

DIRTY TABLE TENNIS IS JUST THE ICEBERG OF DIRTY POLITICS OF THE PAP




The recent election at the Singapore Table Tennis Association shows not only the ugly side of PAP politics but also the questions of future Singapore, meritocracy, equal and fair competition, accountability, check and balance. 

This dirty table tennis is just a small mirror reflecting the ugly politics of the PAP. They just want to control every organisations in Singapore and must sure there is no alternative.  

If you worry about the future of table tennis in Singapore, judging from the STTA election, you should be more worry about the future of Singapore.

STTA election is just an iceberg of the problem. The bigger problem is the monopoly politics of the PAP and how one party rule will produce a weaker Singapore.

In the sea level, you see the mainstream media giving positive reporting about the STTA election. While below the sea level, you see the facebook reporting of Tan Kai Kok. Tan explained the dirty politics of the election, for example, inviting to coffee sessions, taxation investigation, discredit opponents, and even threat.
(please refer to Tan’s facebook for details)

This shows the PAP government is so immature, so lack of confidence, so greedy in controlling everything in Singapore. Nearly 60 years in power, they never change but become more insecure. Why?

Senior citizens, whether Chinese educated or English educated, are voicing out their disagreements with the PAP government. They dare to question the government when they see something not right. Although in a small step, they care about the future of Singapore, just like Tan Cheng Bock. They love Singapore so they want to share their stories, like Tan Kai Kok.

We have seen the happenings in Malaysia. A change of government saves Malaysia. Only Singaporeans can save Singapore!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more