Skip to main content

无视第二把钥匙,李显龙李美花异曲同工储备论。

【异曲同工论储备】

    李显龙的祖宗论和李美花的败家论,异曲同工,就是不可以顺便动用储备。他们似乎就是国家储备的守卫者、门神。他们似乎忘了,动用储备还需要另一把钥匙,还是,根本就不需要另一把钥匙?

    李美华在国会仗义执言,她说我们不应动不动就想到用“阿公”留下来的储蓄,这样做的结果会因而沦为败家子。李美花好心告诫我们小心保管国家的储备。

    几天后,李显龙表示:“储备金是前一代和这一代辛苦累积的老本啊,我们有责任照顾它,把它交给下一辈,当然应该比我们前辈交给我们的来得多,这样才能够对得起祖宗,才能够对得起子孙。

    储备是如此重要,上要对得起祖宗,下要对得起子孙。说白了,我们这一辈,就是要守着储备,像守财奴一样,不要乱花钱,自己赚钱养自己,不要依靠祖宗,当然,也不要花未来钱。

    这是何等的伟大和牺牲!

    李美花和李显龙,层次不同,身份不同,居然道理差不多。

李美花以敢说俗气话出了名,在国会内外,尤其在社交媒体,已经成了网红。她在人民行动党内,唯一的功劳,就是敢说这种一般老百姓听的懂的俗话。行动党还真的缺少这样的人才。因为,看看行动党议员,有些洁身自爱,还不愿为党做出这样的牺牲,有些高高在上,不愿说俗话。算来算去,这种人才还真难找!

同样的储备论,到了李显龙口中,就成了祖宗的大事,老本论。这是祖宗留给后辈的钱,我们不单要保护好,还要增加储蓄,留下更多钱给下一代。我们必须省吃俭用,不能乱花钱,最好是“本是同根生,相煎要(何X) 太急”。最简单,最容易,最快捷的相煎的工具,就是GST. 消费税一视同仁,不分贵贱,一消费,就是一相煎。当然,相煎也分曹丕和曹植,高薪和低薪。

【储备的另一把钥匙在哪里?】

    不论是败家子论,还是,祖宗的老本论,似乎忘记了,动用储备另一把钥匙。他们在讨论储备的时候,根本没有把总统放在眼里,他们的论述,就是保护储备,不要乱用。这本来就是新加坡宪法给予总统的权力,这是总统的职责所在。

    当初设计民选总统制度,就是害怕政府乱用储备,因此,规定总统拥有第二把钥匙。政府动用储备,需要通过总统这一关。

    但是,目前一党独大的局面,行动党可以通过在国会的绝大数,把总统废掉。因此,这第二把钥匙,名义上是存在,实际上,可以说名存实亡。如果要动用储备,这第二把钥匙,行动党政府可以通过合法途径,得心应手的拿到,不用考虑到总统的意愿,反正,现在的总统并不是民选出来,再加上,财经知识不足,根本看不懂储备的来龙去脉。

    选民给行动党70%的支持,行动党又推荐了一个无能的总统,这第二把储备钥匙,可以说是形同虚设。相煎急与不急,完全操在行动党政府和李显龙手中。新加坡人自食其果,何来同情!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...