Skip to main content

行动党的优质领导:在小红点种冬天的草,备用电力无力。


【由于顶棚存在,国家体育场内日照时间较短,草皮内目前的主要草种是对日照需求不高的寒季草种。然而在新加坡的高温下,寒季草种的存活率不高。】#1


走了60年的路,行动党连草皮都种不好,何来优秀的领导素质?何来心系新加坡人民?


总理说创党60年,行动党将会继续推出优质的领导团队?站在人民的一边?

这将会是一个什么样的团队呢?他们的素质和以前的团队相比,会不会就像种草那样,出现水土不服,不单看不到本身的问题,甚至根本就没有清楚了解新加坡的气候和风土人情,端出来治国方针,务实的令国人受不了。

因此,行动党是渐行渐远,离人民越来越远。它怎么会不知道新加坡是热带国家,务实的把冬天的草拿来种,难怪体育场一盖好,草皮问题就成了笑话。前几天,股票市场的电力出现问题,连备用电力都无法运作。这对作为国际金融中心的新加坡来说,领导素质表现在哪里?行动党有没有站在股民那一边呢?

滨海的大花园,可以种温带的花草树木,让国人和游客享受。为何国家体育场不能如愿以偿呢?同样的封闭,为何出现问题?在大花园里行走,是不出汗的。在体育场看球,如果球赛不精彩,你就会一直喊热, 热,热。出现这样的落差,是因为大花园有空调,有如金马伦高原,清迈那样的天气,温带的花草树木才可以茂盛的生长。而可怜的体育场的冬天草,却要忍受热带的天气,怎么可能茂盛的生长,难怪草皮无法顺利生长,为国争光。不单无法为国争光,还给国内外的人留下负面印象。


草皮长不出来,就怪行动党,什么事情错了,就怪行动党。这是否公平?问题是领着世界第一的高薪,又说自己是优质领导,人民就要货比货,一样一样跟你计较。因为行动党说领导体育城是人才,领导股票市场的是优质人才,同时这些人又领着高薪,人民就要看结果,看你拿出什么成绩来。结果是连草皮都无法种好,还误判了新加坡了天气。而急需的备用电力也无法及时为股票市场提供电力。

从体育城和股票市场的管理,人民就会联想到其他的公共管理效率,公共措施的实行效率。这几年下来,或许说自从有了社交媒体,网民就会拿行动党的政绩来做比较。比较现在和以前,现在和10,20。。60年前比较,李总理和李资政的比较,李总理和吴作栋的比较。还有国内和国外领导人的比较。

货比货,就像小贩中心那样,行动党说我们卖的是优质领导,快来买,一定香香,又好吃。不过,价钱要高出许多。你和其他的小贩买,行动党还不高兴呢!说你傻,低价是不可能出好货的。偏偏你不相信,试了一下其他小贩的食物,不单价廉物美,服务周到,口感也不比行动党的食物差。

一比较,就会发现,原来不是这么一回事。所谓的优质领导,除了高薪外,好像都不比以前强,都不比国外强。因此,我们不能不对这个所谓的优质领导,优秀团队来一个大检讨。我们也不能不对行动党所谓的永远站在人民的一边,起疑心。到底行动党的领导素质好在哪里?而口头的民主社会主义,是不是站在人民的一边?

备用电力都无法操作,如果是医院,这可是人命关天的事。

从草皮到备用电力失效,事情似乎越来越严重,体育运动在新加坡经济比重太小,影响的是面子问题。股票市场关系到国际金融,而金融又是新加坡经济的重心。行动党可以说不善于体育管理,但是金融管理,却是行动党自认的专长,偏偏就出了问题。当然,这只是硬件问题,电力问题。但是,地铁出现问题,不也是硬件先出现问题,后来在调查后,才知道是管理出现问题,把重心放在盈利上,不再站在人民一边来考虑问题。

因此,行动党的经济管理已经出现问题,领导素质出现很多盲点,他们看问题,甚至可以不按照自然天气的运行,硬是要拿冬天的草种在新加坡这块热带的小红点。离开了自然规律,想到的是自己的高薪,怎么可能是和人民站在一起?


#1

http://www.redotnews.com/sports/show/56648.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...