Skip to main content

技穷才尽–行动党渴望对手犯错

行动党最近频频向工人党喊话,要工人党表明立场,不要躲躲藏藏,捞取政治资本。行动党渴望对手犯错,希望工人党在表明立场出现错误,那么行动党就可以得分,赢回一些政治资本。

行动党要求工人党清楚表明什么立场呢? 
【英兰妮:头巾事件的讨论须考虑我国种族融合】#1
 【哈里古玛批评工人党 争议性课题立场模糊】#2

行动党真的到了技穷才尽的地步,自己不图上进,反而希望从对手表明立场时,如果立论不足,论据不够,就可以捞回政治资本。行动党为何沦落到这个地步。没有了过去的政治优势,没有了(集选区)政治保护网,行动党竟然不懂得如何为国人提供更高素质的生活,反而希望对手犯错,继续执政。

这样的行动党会有前途吗?这样的新加坡前途何在?

这里举两个简单的商业例子来说明:

苹果,三星希望对手犯错吗?

苹果,三星当然希望对手犯错,但是,更重要的是他们对自己有要求,他们要求自己的产品做得更好,更加吸引顾客,更多的人以拥有苹果三星为荣。(行动党应该想一想,新加坡人是否会以它为荣?)

而诺基亚,黑莓呢!在产品设计,多样化都不如对手。他们希望对手的新产品,新设计不受市场欢迎,本身反应迟钝,因此,一输再输,输到把自己都卖给别人。
(行动党一输再输,是否也会把新加坡卖给别人?)

因此,行动党还活在智能手机未上市前的日子。他们希望对手犯错,像诺基亚,黑莓那样,依靠老本来过活。诺基亚,黑莓没有行动党这么好命,他们要在竞争激烈的商场打拼,他们没有像行动党那样有各种的保护网。因此,虽然对手有时也会犯错,但是,总的来说,依靠别人犯错来取分的思维,是要不得的。

这种思维,只能加速自己的灭亡。行动党还活在过去,像过去那样,希望对手犯错,即使错的是一点点的技术错误,例如上街示威,多人集合在一起,都把这些动作放大,好像这些行为,就是误国误民。

时代已经改变了,即使行动党呼吁全民反对黑客,呼吁大家一起反对黑客。但是,了解黑客的行为,了解黑客的目的,和他们要表现的不满,这样一来,未必全民会同意行动党的所作所为。因此,黑客犯错,并不表示人们会全力支持行动党的呼吁,全民反黑客。

所以,全民反对黑客,只不过是行动党的一厢情愿,黑客犯错,并不表示行动党就可以捞到政治资本。反而,人们会反问为何黑客要这么做,目的何在?想通了,行动党的政治资本反而会下降。

邵氏电影,必属佳作?

60,70年代华人电影的帝国,非邵氏电影不可。为何在后来,就连独立制片,独立电影公司都能打倒邵氏,问题出在哪里?这些独立制作,就连菲林,电影的映像,音响效果都不如邵氏,但是还是一样卖座。

为什么? 为何邵氏电影这样的帝国,会斗不过独立制片公司?为什么有着这样多的院线,在香港东南亚有这样多的地皮,现在连一个产业大亨的地位都没有?

是不是希望别人犯错,自己坐在哪里等收成?就是最好的政策?行动党应该尽快的找到为新加坡人追求最大利益,更高素质生活的方法,不然,它的命运将会和诺基亚,黑莓,邵氏电影帝国一样。

即使别人犯错,利益未必归行动党。

后港补选就是一个例子。但是,行动党自己犯错,选民可就不是这么想。选民看到行动党犯错,不但不同情,反而要求更高,结果就出现榜鹅东的结局。

行动党也知道自己不可以再犯错了。一再的犯错就会失去更多的政治资本。人口政策已经失去一些政治资本,但是全国对话却捞不回失去的政治资本。因此,行动党现在的希望就是看到对手犯错。

政策之一就是要工人党清楚表明立场,不要模模糊糊,希望在工人党表明立场后,可以找到错误,加以反击,捞回一些政治资本。

这种一厢情愿的做法,这种不求上进的思维,真的是要不得。它不单不能提高行动党的作战能力,反而加速行动党的灭亡。

为何人才济济的行动党,会看不到历史的教训?难怪人们都说行动党的将军是纸将军,只会纸上谈兵。面对竞争,就只会希望对手犯错,而不会考虑把国家治理的更好,做出更大的成绩来。

工人党市镇会追收居民的欠款不理想,是政治犯错,还是政治加分,行动党心里应该有数。选民也会理解,到底是谁比较体谅人民的疾苦?

新加坡的前途不是建立在行动党犯错,工人党犯错上的。行动党应该想想如何做得更好,而不是好而已。诺基亚,黑莓和邵氏的电影都好,但是,别人做得比你更好,结果就很明显了。

#1

#2







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...