Skip to main content

李显扬的选择代表什么? 坚定李光耀精神?对体制的反抗?无病呻吟的哀嚎?

 李显扬的选择代表什么?

坚定李光耀精神?对体制的反抗?无病呻吟的哀嚎?


作为李光耀遗属唯一执行人,李显扬坚定的认为,他必须履行李光耀的原则、遗属的精神,把故居拆除。他的坚持,或者固执,似乎是李家的传统。李光耀固执,他的三个孩子也一样固执,坚持自己的理念。


因此,显扬选择作为一个政治难民。他的选择,是不是针对新加坡现有体制的无力反抗?他认为他被打压,无法有效的执行遗属的内容和精神。以西方的民主标准,新加坡是一个半民主半专制半自由的地方,因此,流亡英国,就像以前被政府打压的人一样,得以呼吸自由空气。


新加坡人是否会以,以前政府对待不同意见人士的态度,看显扬。新加坡人已经习惯,目前的政治安排,甚至,有些人会认为他是无病呻吟。李光耀生前,认为显扬擅长金融投资,而显龙则偏向政治。为何一个金融人士,却对政治有那么固执的坚持?


李光耀和先辈们,一直很努力坚持一些原则和精神,如:反贪,态度认真,努力不求回报;新加坡才得以走到今天。李家第二代,却出现两种不同的坚持理念,固执的守护。或许,他们都应该退出,而让新的领导班子,做出最有利于新加坡的决定。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...