Skip to main content

Rental Economy means Singaporeans are eating old capital (吃老本) and the PAP government is a ‘Jiak Liao Bee’.

Rental Economy means Singaporeans are eating old capital (吃老本) and the PAP government is a ‘Jiak Liao Bee’. 




The PAP is at the turning point as a new book regarding her story from 1985 to 2021 described. The turning point, in fact, began in 1985 as we moved away from the hardworking model to a rental economy.  The then Economic Committee headed by Lee Hsien Loong recommended CPF  and wage cuts to stimulate the economy.


In this Singapore model of rental economy, wages and salaries are flexible and controllable items.  We know too well who heads the NTUC and inside the NTUC, there is a PAP.



So, if you are doing big business in Singapore, you know you can enjoy some ‘rental income’ from the PAP-NTUC linkage. You also know you have a ‘rental advantage’ when it comes to employment, especially foreign workers and talents.  


Of course, the rental economy also comes from our strategic location, our institutions, like banking, medical, legal, languages and even education.  



From 1985 to 2021, we are eating (吃老本) our old assets, old capitals built up by Pioneer and Merdeka Generations. Yes, we have achieved economic growth but we also lose our pioneer spirit and hardworking attitude.


This is why the current PAP government is a ‘Jiak Liao Bee’ (good for nothing) government. 


One very obvious example is Tony Tan. In the 2011 Presidential Election, Tony was booed at ‘jiak liao bee’ at the nomination centre.  His 6-year term proved his ‘good for nothing’ presidency.  You cannot expect the current president to do better than him.  So, another ‘jiak liao bee’. 


All these ‘jiao liao bee’ presidents and governments are lucky because of our rental economy.  Meritocracy has no place in a rental economy.  Doing nothing can also enjoy a high salary despite the rich-poor divide, income inequality, as there is a political system protecting the rental economy. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more