Skip to main content

越傻越拗,阿斗成了阿Q。 不孝不忠,阿龙何去何从?


 越傻越拗,阿斗成了阿Q。

不孝不忠,阿龙何去何从?


自我自大,自我封闭,自我陶醉,自我感觉良好。这是阿斗。

国会硬拗,告人硬拗,4G硬拗,硬拗故居永在。这是阿Q.


国人素质在阿斗管理下,一路向下,不进反而大倒退。用完餐,不清理垃圾,罚300。阿斗素质教育失败,阿Q精神出现, 认为国人只是害怕罚款,因此,罚300是最佳手段。


阿斗是越傻越硬拗,把自己阿Q化。他的‘没有病不要戴口罩’的傻劲,发展到他出席亚细安会议,需要两个口罩防毒,也可以说是阿Q精神再现。


报纸无法吸引读者,阿斗的傻CEO说不利经营,无利可图。因此,只好进行阿Q式的改组,硬拗只有依靠政府津贴才可以继续为PAP宣传说话。


不孝子是弟妹说的,不是我们外人说的。


不忠呢?观其行,则可知。罔顾国人生命,急功近利,让变种病毒入侵;例一。核心新加坡人,现在外人可以顶替;例二。任何爱国爱民语言,与行动党政府利益冲突,就是排外、仇外,歧视;例三。


不忠不孝,难怪现在国人对阿龙即阿Q的看法完全改变:从依靠父亲积德上任的呆子阿斗,演变而成鲁迅笔下的阿Q。遇到事情,找借口。躲在国会,利用法庭,求胜利。自己无能,把4G搞到更加无能。明明一件事情可以说清楚(印度人),偏偏因为胆小害怕而另一个名称(南亚人)。


中国已经从鲁迅时代的东亚病夫,一跃而成为世界第二大经济体。我们的李显龙,从阿斗进一步退化到阿Q,虽然还不是东亚病夫,可是国际会议一个接着一个取消,已经不是老外眼中的安全区和抵抗新冠模范生。


冠病加速把阿斗变成阿Q。算数高手、才子阿斗2004出任总理。在李光耀的光环和吴作栋的护驾下,却在2011年输了一个集选区。2015年,李光耀走了,阿斗利用父亲阴气,变得阿Q式聪明,赢得大胜利。此后,阿斗就走上阿Q自我封闭的不归路。2020年,利用冠病疫情的阿Q式大选,不孝子又再输多一个集选区。


阿Q最擅长的是告诫国人牺牲,我们要自律,不要随意出门,不要说话,不要不戴口罩。阿Q也不会轻易道歉,机场被变种病毒入侵,也没有自我检讨。口口声声说我们一定要开放,甚至还叫IB打手出来说,宁可关闭1000个商场、小贩中心,也不关机场。


阿Q也是守财奴,一直到现在还认为世界第一的高薪,当之无愧,一点也没有减薪,和人民共同渡过难关的意愿。


新加坡继续被阿Q不孝子硬拗下去将会是一个什么样的结局?阿Q要你付出,牺牲,学习,进修,提升,新加坡人要努力,听话,不要搞分裂,不要听假新闻,不要歧视外人,仇外,这么多东西要完成,那么阿Q和他的内阁,除了领高薪外,还做出什么牺牲?


阿Q离民意太远,阿Q只想画圈圈,就像鲁迅笔下临死前的阿Q。一直画,不孝子也嫌新加坡人画的圈圈不够圆。新加坡何去何从?我们一直画圈圈,一直在圈圈内打滚,无法跳出圈圈。


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...