Skip to main content

Competition from Malaysia? Real or not real?



Whether real or not real, it is possible and soon we will face competition from Malaysia if the new government is doing the right things there.  As reported in the news, there are some promising signs in term of meritocracy, transparency and democracy. And most importantly, they are not afraid to admit their past mistakes.

    Real or not real, Singapore cannot take it lightly like the past 60 years.

Consider the “if” factors:
  • If the Penang experience can spread to the whole of Malaysia.
  • If Malays can appreciate and value the importance the third language - Chinese. And Malaysia can turn it as their edge over Singapore.
  • If the government is more open and transparent than Singapore. Yes. it is a real challenge.
  • If the leaders and GLCs executives are selected based on performance and meritocracy. Yes. They have started.
  • If there are less political influences in business and commerce. Yes. They are trying.

If Singapore only looks at the short-term issues like HSR, water, immigrations-checkpoints, etc, and fail to see the changes in Malaysia, by the time, we realise the real challenges and competition from Malaysia, it is too late.

Based on the record of the past 60 years, the many “ifs” still remain “ifs” in Malaysia, there is no improvement and as Mahathir said the corruption situation has worsen and political appointed executives are all over the government and government-linked companies. And he intends to replace 20,000 of such appointments.

Looking back at our own situation in Singapore and our management teams of GLCs and associated so-called private enterprises, do we face the same problems as the new Mahathir government?  Real or not real will see how we perform as compared to their Malaysian counterparts.

The mindset of “we always win” may have to change as soon as possible.  “We may lose”, perhaps, should be the new mindset.

On the HSR issue, Mahathir said it is “not urgent” so do many other issues that involving Singapore and Malaysia. Mahathir has chosen Indonesia as the first Asean country as his official visit despite PM Lee Hsien Loong making an urgent visit there.

Is “not urgent” real or not real? Why is Mahathir making such a statement? Some argue he is using water issue to delay or bargain for the HSR issue. It is an over simplistic explanation. If PM Lee is also thinking the same way, he has not seen the real competition from Malaysia.

So what are the competition from Malaysia? If they only manage to solve half of the “if” factors and problems, do they still pose a challenge to us?  

Then we may have to look at the citizen engagement. Mahathir said his government will fall if there is no trust from the people. While, PM Lee is asking for your trust - he wants Singaporeans to trust him but on what ground?

Pakatan Harapan can fall unless it upholds people's trust: Dr M

http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2018/06/30/pakatan-harapan-can-fall-unless-it-upholds-peoples-trust-dr-m

Trust is key in whether citizens accept unpopular decisions by Govt, says PM Lee

https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/trust-is-key-in-whether-citizens-accept-unpopular-decisions-by-govt-pm-lee
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more