Skip to main content

From two-speed to multi-speed economy, vicious cycle continues and goes deeper.



The ruling People’s Action Party has finally admitted having a  two-speed economy, one for the poor and the other for the rich.

“Calling this a “two-speed economy”, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said the challenge is to ensure that a large part of the economy does not get stuck on low gear, because then overall wages will see little growth. “
www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-has-to-deepen-skills-spur-innovation-in-every-industry-8844264

In fact, once we acknowledge the two-speed economy, we are already entering into a multi-speed economy where there are at least two two-speed economies in Singapore, one for locals and the other for foreigners. Each two-speed economy has very distinctive rich and poor representatives.

In the government defined two-speed economy, we can find clear evidence of three-speed or even four-speed economy. This is the big question of middle class - few move up and more move down. When we talk about the distinct identity of Singaporeans, we may have to re-define the distinctive characteristics of Singaporeans living in different speed level of economy. They have different lifestyles, consumption patterns, cultural values and attitudes.

Here are some examples from the consumption points of view:

Speed
Supermarkets
Foods
Transport
Hospital
High
Gourmet, Jasons
Hotels, specialised restaurants   
Big car
Private, A
Upper Middle
Cold Storage, NTUC Finest
Restaurants, food courts
Car, MRT
B1, A
Lower Middle
NTUC, Giant
Food courts, hawker centres
MRT, Bus
B2,  B1
Low
Ang Mo, ABC shops
Hawker centres, coffee shops
Walk, Bus
C

We don’t have so many neighbourhood supermarkets like Ang Mo, ABC shops in the past. However, there is a great demand for such shopping as this can help middle class people to bring down their costs.  However, low income people find no way to cut their living expenses.  This is why there is a need to have C-class beds in public hospitals.


Singapore long decided to practise two-speed economy in 1980s. Singapore went into recession in 1985/1986.  In the Report of The Economic Committee (then chaired by PM Lee Hsien Loong) made the loss of competitiveness as one of the internal factors for recession:

screenshot-www.mti.gov.sg-2017-05-20-16-05-30.png

Wage costs increased was one of the major reasons for the loss of our competitiveness. With this mindset, the PAP government has a very tight control on labor costs. And one effective way to cut down the labor costs is to allow free access of foreign labor.

For Singaporeans, the PAP intentionally maintains a low-speed economy just to keep up our competitiveness. For foreigners, they also do the same thing. We have Singaporeans continue to rent flats from Housing Development Board and foreigners staying in overcrowded HDB and private flats.   

As far as the government maintains this attitude, Singapore cannot avoid not to have a two-speed or three-speed economy. And many people will continue to face the vicious cycle of poverty trap.


Source: Google search

The recent event of oversupply of HDB flats (due to high price in matured areas) indicates the problems facing middle class Singaporeans. We know the unhappiness of middle class led to Brexit and the surprise win of Donald Trump.  There are fewer middle class moving up and more middle class moving down. Singapore, too, faces the same problems.

If there is no change in mindset and constant fear of loss of competitiveness, it is very likely Singapore will become a multi-speed economy, her growth speed will have wider standard deviation than before, i.e. wider rich-poor gap.   

This is perhaps another distinctive achievement of Singapore multi-speed economy.

Comments


  1. شركة الحمد للتنظيف من افضل الشركات في السعوديه نقدم لك افضل الادوات
    شركة تنظيف خزانات بجازان نقدم
    نقدم لكم شركة الخدمات المتكامله للتنظيف في جازان
    شركة عزل خزانات بجازان
    j

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...