Skip to main content

In the name of Environment, the PAP government finds a ‘smart’ way to increase revenues.



It is difficult to increase Goods and Services Tax (GST) in an uncertain economic environment. But the government needs money, instead of rising GST, water tax and carbon tax can generate the same effect and revenue. They will do it in two phases. First they collect the increased water tax in 2107 and 2018, then followed by carbon tax.

GST is a dirty word. People don’t like sales or value added tax as they think it applies to everyone, especially low-income families. GST also has a psychological effect, especially for businesses. The destruction created by GST to the economy is huge and so GST is a weapon of last resort.

GST increase is aso bad for election.  Hence, the PAP government will try not to raise GST before the next election. In the meantime, they have to depend on water tax and carbon tax to generate revenue. They have already tried very best to make money from ERP, road tax, COEs, car parks fees, tobacco tax, liquor tax etc. (and indirectly through increased town council fees).  

Furthermore, in a slow growth economy, due to lower business activities, the growth rate for GST collection will also be lower than before. In fact, in an uncertain investment environment, the return of state assets will also be lower.  

For those who argue Singapore has a low water price and we should match price to production cost, it is important they understand WATER IS A HUMAN RIGHT.  

governments-leo-heller-un-special-rapporteur-on-the-human-right-to-wash-16th-januaryun-water-zaragoza-conference-2015-1-638.jpg

screenshot-www.un.org-2017-02-25-18-56-59.png

Singapore has a very high GINI index and the rich-poor gap will create problems for lower income families despite the government HDB subsidy.    

Certainly, matching price to production cost is a pure economic decision. It certainly never considers water is a human right. It is also against United Nation resolution of providing affordable drinking water to the people.  
100% up water.png
This is a typical PAP solution to social problems.

###

While water tax and carbon tax are environment friendly. We are against waste of natural resources, global warming, air-pollution, etc. By introducing these two taxes, Singaporeans can show the world we are engaging in environment protection strategies.

In paper, these taxes are to adjust social ill - bad habit for water consumption, driving car, etc, like tobacco and liquor taxes.

However, tobacco tax has resulted to many low income and foreign workers smoking very low grade of cigarettes. And so do the lower quality of liquor products. This will lead to social costs (health issues). Our GDP per capita increases, but those, who cannot catch up with the price increase, will have to end up with lower quality of life.

Perhaps, we all forget about the UN resolution: water is a human right. And the PAP government is famous for human rights violation.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...