Skip to main content

The Future Economy in A Smart City


[The Future Economy 2]

Singapore is marching towards a smart city as well as a digital city. Our Smart Nation Vision declares:

[Singapore is building the World's first Smart Nation by harnessing technology to the fullest with the aim of improving the lives of citizens,creating more opportunities, and building stronger communities.] ^1

Many government departments, for example, URA, HDB, LTA, IDA, etc. have also put forward their proposals for a Smart Nation. Below is just one of the examples.


Our future economy, as a city state, is linked to the digital world. IDA claims we will be the first nation in the world using and ‘harnessing technology’ in developing a smart city (= nation).    

Our future depends on our smart city planning. Mr. Heng Swee Kiat, who will be chairing the Future Economy Committee, indicates that his task is to move from a ‘value-adding’ to a ‘value-creating’ economy. He also points out five future challenges: jobs, companies, resources, technology and markets.^2

In a smart city, how can we create values for jobs, companies, resources, technology and markets? When Minister Heng talks about ‘creating’ rather than ‘adding’ values, it looks like we are doing some things different from the past. But how different?

'Adding values' seem to be an easier job, for example, bringing in foreign workers, building casinos, giving tax incentives to foreign companies, etc. 'Creating values' will need innovations and making things from nothing, more risks, more freedom, transparency and democracy.  Wow!

Can the same old political structure of one-party rule still be relevant in the future economy?

Professor Dominique Boullier of Sciences Po Paris outlines a smart city model which involves certainties and uncertainties; attachment and detachment.  There are four components in the model: Good Old, Smart, Data and Wiki city.

Screenshot 2015-11-03 16.21.07.png

GE2015 suggests Singaporeans prefer to remain in ‘certainties’ - from Good old city to Smart city.  However, we also prepare to move from ‘Attachments’ to ‘Detachment’. ‘Gold old city’ model is very much a colonial model and SG50 is part of it. Singapore still feels comfortable to work under  ‘models’. We will use all the latest technology, research and consultancy to develop our smart city model.

But to create more values to the economy, we will have to move away from ‘certainties’. This means there is no suitable models, or
no model at all under Data City and Wiki City. You create values from big data which has no previous pattern or need to share information in a crowd.  The information and media control in Singapore will pose a challenge in these two sub-components.

Perhaps, we are only happy to achieve 70% coverage of the jobs and market - controlling all components of ‘certainties’ models and some components of ‘uncertainties’ models.  Is this the future economy of Singapore - a smart city flying with 60% or 70% capacity?
^1
https://www.ida.gov.sg/Tech-Scene-News/Smart-Nation-Vision

^2
http://www.straitstimes.com/business/economy/committee-to-review-singapore-economy-to-be-set-up-by-december-and-report-year





Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more