否极泰来 Piji Tailai

  When progress and development become irrelevant to ordinary citizens,  where are the dreams and hopes? Actually, we must be proud of our SG60 achievements. We must also be very proud of the future big projects, like T5, new port, new MRT lines, new town developments, as well as the many social programs. However, when you are struggling with the cost of living, jobs, medical and child care,  you basically forget about all those achievements, past, present and future.  How to make you feel you are in it, these achievements belong to you?  Building tomorrow together? The government wants you to feel it, share it and build it.   Wow!   For generations, we have produced geniuses running Singapore since our independence.  In fact, the western democracies also did the same things, big projects, big dreams.  Yet, irrelevancy, no feeling, lost confidence, lead to jokers being elected.  Building tomorrow together? Sharing our future togethe...

  添财变蠢材 务实变无知 信任变危机 内政思维变外交方向 和事生财变扭曲历史 逻辑歪理变好高骛远 既然承认一个中国，台湾就是中国的一部分。 我们不要外人干涉内政，却对他国内政指手画脚，这是无知，白痴，逻辑不通的。行动党可以对反对党，打压，黑白不分，但是，走出国门，就是不一样。一出口，尾巴就露出来了。 失道寡助???只好自求多福???

  English educated Singaporeans in trouble or our education in trouble? Does Lawrence Wong need a new foreign adviser? From Mideast to East Asai, even in the ASEAN region, some of his views seem “stupid, idiot and illogical”.  Saying something similar to Lee Hsien Loong may not have the same outcome. Lee is the son of the senior Lee. Don’t use our limited success to judge others. Don’t use our short history, culture to imagine the world. Don’t use our English educated mindset to assess the new international order.

  台湾当下现状，类似97前的香港，被掏空？ 97前，英国人掏空香港。 当下，美国人正在掏空台湾。 97后，英国一年不如一年； 美国是否也将步上英国，一年不如一年？ 风水轮流转，掏空别人，不务实工作，更加欠缺远见。历史的发展，竟然如此戏剧，巧夺强取500年，最终还是无法壮大自己。

  Stupid and Idiot, which one is more serious? Apology. One to the minister. One from the minister.  An apology in parliament because of a stupid question with purpose?   An apology in public because of an idiot comment from a typical mindset? Some would argue stupid question is more serious because he or she may lose his or her parliamentary seat. Some would argue that an idiot's comment is more serious because a minister is talking, especially a foreign city involved. Domestic versus international.   Anyway, the analogy and mindset may have been due to the PAP’s culture, education, monopoly in parliament… No minister has resigned because of stupid or idiot but corruption.   So, whether stupid or idiot, it will not affect a minister.  Really?   

  人在做，天在看？ 愚蠢问题？愚蠢的人？ 愚蠢人不准你说他愚蠢。 愚蠢人不满意你没有被套住。 愚蠢人的回答你必须接受；不能添油加醋。 原来，愚蠢是可以建立在霸权垄断上。 垄断为愚蠢开路，霸权为愚蠢装修。 民意法庭对上司法公正，是不是愚蠢的事？ 谁是愚蠢的人，谁在说愚蠢的事？ 立法经过国会通过，才成为司法的依据。 谁拥有国会的多数，尤其是三分二的绝对优势， 就成了立法的造王者，霸权垄断。 胜者为王，败者为寇？ 观其行，时间未到，风水轮流转？