Skip to main content

The Not So Absolute Way for George Yeo

Less George, Less Yin for the PAP – Part 2
(Chinese Books that George read)


Judging from the Chinese books that George Yeo likes and read, it seems that he is traveling in a not so absolute way.

In his Facebook, George has clearly stated that he likes the phrase “道可道,非常道.” Lin Yu-tang translated this into “The Dao that can be told of is not the Absolute Dao.”  So, is George heading for a not so absolute way?  And so he needs time to seriously think about his Presidential ambition.
.
道可道,非常道” is also the first sentence of the first chapter of Laozi’s “Dao De Jing”, a favorite book of George. Not only Dao (Tao or the Way) can not be defined, so do Name. Dao is the highest order of philosophical Daoism and so there is no possibility to explain, describe and name it.   Let look at Chapter 1 of Dao De Jing:

1. On the Absolute Tao (translated by Lin Yu-tang)

The Tao that can be told of
Is not the Absolute Tao;
The Names that can be given
Are not Absolute Names.

The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth;
The Named is the Mother of All Things.
Therefore:
Oftentimes, one strips oneself of passion
In order to see the Secret of Life;
Oftentimes, one regards life with passion,
In order to see its manifest forms.

These two (the Secret and its manifestations)
Are (in their nature) the same;
They are given different names
When they become manifest.
They may both be called the Cosmic Mystery:
Reaching from the Mystery into the Deeper Mystery
Is the Gate to the Secret of All Life.

Wikisource has another translation of Chapter 1, which seems easier to understand:

The Dao is able to be stated, but it is not the common Dao / stating;
[Its] name is able to be named, but it is not the common name / naming.
Wu is the beginning of the heaven and the earth;
Yu is the mother of all things.
So,
Being always Wu is necessary, So do such can perceive its wonder;
Being always Yu is necessary, So do such can watch its border.
These two have the same origin, and they differ in name;
Both are called Xuan.
One Xuan plus another Xuan, are the sources of all wonders.

Wu (无)and You (有) – Nameless and Named

Dao is engaged in a journey of Nameless and Named or “haven’t and have”. Human beings may achieve Named (have) position, but spiritually, he or she still remain Nameless (haven’t). You may be rich but still feel emptiness.

Applying to economics, Singapore has achieved high GDP growth. However, we are not happy.

For philosophical Daoism, achieving internal satisfaction is more important then external or physical satisfaction. So, when George  attended the Cabinet meeting in the past, he was different from others and voiced out policies that would lead to internal dissatisfaction (of the people).

Perhaps, this is why Mr. Shanmugan commented that George was special, a unique person and even irreplaceable. Records of Cabinet meeting are not open to public, and so there is no way to prove it – the contribution of Yin elements from George.  However, other Cabinet members should have the fine memories of George’s input and were they taking this into consideration when they formulated strategies and implemented government policies?

From the Changes to the Way

In the previous blog, we discussed about Yin and Yang, i.e. changes (Yi Jing or I-Jing). Now, we move to Dao – the Way.  Laozi liked to emphasize Yin in problem solving, decision making and strategy formulating. Yin is like mother, like baby, like water, like weakness, like the lower class of the society, etc.

Laozi’s strategy is “step backward for the purpose of moving forward”.   He wants to withdraw (from the physical sense), reduce (desires and needs), and remove (unnecessary) so that the opposite side will underestimate the situation, becomes less aware and alert of the actual strength of his opponent.  Hence, stepping backward, being humble, being underclass, being poor is in fact in preparation of moving forward.

Laozi’s withdrawal principle is to teach people how to make use of “Wu” (Nameless, haven’t).  The “You” (Named, have) needs to sit on Wu to be Named (as compared to Nameless), to show the Have (as compared to haven’t).  Just imagine, you are rich because others are not rich; you are famous as others are not famous; you are scholars since others are not.

The Way to Create, Delete and the Computer

The basis programming is simple: 1 (posses, You) and 0 (emptiness, Wu).  From here, it gives birth to a compute.  To use the computer, internet, blog, Facebook, …. etc.  You need to create (1) and when there are too many rubbish, too many files, and they slow down your computer, you need to delete (0) the unnecessary, scan the computer for virus, re-format to make the computer moving faster.

Imagine a world that there is no deletion, no reduction, no withdrawal, and many other no(s), the world will become less efficient, less productive and less livable.  This is why there are too many rubbish in the internetDao is advising and suggesting the application of Wu.

You can keep on creating policies, rules and regulations. The more you create, the less space will make available for people to move about. For the past 50 years, the PAP has implemented many policies, changed the Constitution, introduced GRCs, elected President, etc. For Singapore to move forward, it is important to listen to Singaporeans on how to remove the unnecessary, to reduce the restrictions, and to free the press etc.

This is to prevent a crash on the computer. An occupied computer with full of useful and useless information and documentation is functionless computer.  A Singapore with full of necessary and unnecessary policies, rules and regulations will not function as well as the past.


The Art of War and Anti-War

Just a short note on another book, The Art of War that George likes.  Many people consider this book as a master of strategy. Few have realized that the book has its origin (or at least influenced by) from Dao De Jing.

Dao De Jing and the Art of War are both against war and anti war. They do not consider war as the best solution and if possible, the best option is to avoid war and seek peaceful settlement through negotiation, even with some sacrifices or forgoing own benefits.

War is only the last resort and even there is a war, those involved should prevent massive killings, casualty, and dead.  This is inline with the principle of withdrawal, reduction, and removes.

Free Spirit – Dao – the Way

When asked about his greatest regret in his last public news conference as Foreign Minister, George’s reply was philosophical: “Many people have asked me that question. To be very frank, that’s not the way my mind is constructed. It’s not the way I think.

“I’m a bit of a Taoist, so I tend to detach myself and see myself in a larger role. Things happen for a reason and we are part of bigger flows in life.” (Asiaone.com)

And about the running for President, his answer is also very philosophical.  In response to this, he laughed and said: “I’m flattered by all these proposals but I’m a free spirit. I don’t think my temperament is suited for such a job.”

By giving answers like ‘not the way my mind is constructed’; ‘a bit of Taoist’; and ‘free spirit’; can we summarize that George is adopting a ‘backward strategy’ and giving himself rooms to move forward?

Shall we conclude that this is another Not So Absolute Way for George?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...