Skip to main content

Besides labor and talents, Singaporeans face competition of foreign money too.

 

Being an international city and centre for financial activities, foreign money are free to move in and out of Singapore to take advantage of the investment opportunities here, including property.  

 

With a limited population, and a stable increase in income, the sharp rise of property price has to come from external demand. And these foreigners have extra money, a lot of it, which Singaporeans will find very hard to fight against them.

 

Since property price increases are foreign driven, what can the government do to protect Singaporean’s dream of owning a house or flat

?  And what can normal Singaporeans prepare for the money competition?

 

The cause: Property price increases are foreign driven.

 

In a Dow Jones article ‘Singapore Prime Minister: Global Monetary Conditions Are Abnormal’, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that current global monetary conditions were abnormal with excess liquidity in the system finding its way to emerging markets.

"Money is running around and looking for investment," He also said that these capital inflows that are finding their way into emerging markets were resulting in property and asset price increases, including that in China and Hong Kong.

"Singapore has seen it (property price increases) too. The market has seen a drastic increase in the last two years to our concern," Lee said. (Dow Jones)

PM Lee has admitted there is a foreign and local money competition in Singapore property market. So, his solution is to increase the property supply to meet the demand.

The solution: Worrying, alerting and supplying

‘Why Khaw is worried …..’ is the headline of a Today report.  The report said the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) announced a strong supply under the Government Land Sales Programme for the second half of this year. Mr Khaw Boon Wan, however shared his worries in his blog that "things can go very wrong suddenly", possibly over the next two years.

This, even as the authorities now tackle the issue of housing affordability. But Mr Khaw not only noted that "sharp property price increases cannot go on forever", he cautioned that mishaps could befall those seeking to invest or upgrade in the months ahead.
The external situation is "not exactly bullish" either. He said Europe's sovereign debt woes will take a long time to clear, and the Middle East crisis "can still go ugly", which may lead to a spike in oil prices and affect economic recovery in Asia and Singapore.

Disclosing that foreigners comprised 16 per cent of private property buyers between January and March, Mr Khaw had this message for Singaporeans who buy properties in the hope of renting to those coming here: "In the event of any external shock, both foreign demand and rental demand can fall quite quickly. The impact can be serious if (it) happens at a time when there's a substantial increase in supply."

His final caution was that interest rates will not remain low forever.

"It is my duty to sound an alert," said Mr Khaw. (Today)

Money making Model

Both PM Lee and Minister Khaw confirmed our property price is linked to foreign money when there is an inflow, price will go up (Lee’s view – abnormal excess liquidity) and when there is an outflow, price will go down(Khaw’s view - external shock).

In such a case, how to provide affordable housing to citizens under free foreign money inflow and outflow policy?  PAP Model of making money is to increase Supply and leaving Demand intact.  There is no mention of affordable housing means selling them at a lower price and so the more they sell the more money they make, even for public housing.

Singapore is a small economy and the West has excess cash and money finding means to park in Asia and Singapore. The size of this foreign money is many times of our property market, so the demand is always greater than supply. Hence, the price increases.  When price increases, government profit will increase too. This increase will also help to maintain affordable public housing at a higher level.

This is similar to foreign labour and talent policy. They just allow foreign labour and talents to come in as far as there is a foreign and local demand.   They like to use Supply Side theory to solve problems because they can make more money by giving more work permits, passes, PRs and even citizenships.

Local population and citizens will have to face the competition, in job, wages, and opportunity. So do the property market with foreign money.

Dream and Hope for upgrade

‘Tough time for S’pore upgraders’, The Star reported.   (http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/15/business/8899173&sec=business)
It said the price gap between mass market private homes and Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats has widened to a new record making it harder than ever for aspiring HDB upgraders to buy a private home.
You think of upgrade with you fixed income and salary. However, the foreign money that is going to buy private property in Singapore is using extra cash to compete with you. A little bit like you are going to a casino and even they upgrade you to VIP you are going to run out of cash one day.

Protection of citizens

I do not have the answer - whether increase supply and control demand will result to a better solution.  But as a government, the first duty to protect the interest of its citizens as foreign money, like foreign labour ad talents are transit passengers of our city hotels or hostels.

However, for people want to invest, speculate, and upgrade on their properties, it is worth taking note of Khaw’s warning and alert. At the end of the day, if there is a crash in the market, PAP will say they have warned you before and are unable to help those buy property at high prices. This time it will be worst for property losers as there is no workfare, training or others to help to recap your losses. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...