Skip to main content

George Yeo for President – A Dream or a Stone?


Less George, Less Yin for the PAP – Part 3
(The Dream of Red Chamber)


Besides the Chinese books that mentioned in the previous post, George also likes ‘The Dream of Red Chamber’.  This masterpiece of Chinese literature has a few names.  In fact, many experts agree that its original name is called ‘The Story of A Stone’ (in the form of a Jade). 

A stone as well as a dream

One needs to relate the relationship between the stone and the dream in the development of this romantic story.  Red Chamber in fact is talking about a stone from heaven traveling to the earth and wants to experience the human life. It is an extra piece of stone which supposes to fill the hole of the universal.  Due to its redundancy, this ‘useless’ stone then makes its way to the world to see the real life. How the rich and famous live? Why woman is water? And how Chinese culture, religion, philosophy influences their thinking and decision making?

It is like a dream describing a family from rich and famous to poor and notorious. It is the opposite of Pi Ji Tai Lai (). Pi Ji Tai Lai means when misfortune reaches the limit, good fortune is at hand. Out of the depth of misfortune comes bliss. Unfortunately, this rich family of Jia is from Tai Lai (good fortune) to Pi Ji (bad fortune).  And there is a well known saying that all monkeys disperse when the big tree (family) falls.  

Written by Cao Xue Qin, many believe he was telling his own story in the Red Chamber.  We need to know some backgrounds about this book, so as to understand why George likes it and has ‘yin’ elements in his thinking.

Mao Zedong valued Red Chamber over others

The Dream of Red Chamber is one of the 4 great Chinese novels (四大名著). However, it is very different from the other three (Three Kingdoms, Water Margin and The Journey to the West).  Three Kingdoms, another liked book of George, is very popular for strategy and war study. Water Margin and The Journey to the West too are used for business and management case studies although at a lesser extent.

Red Camber is different from the others in many ways: family and female centric, hidden meaning, political implication, cultural reflection of the time, different version etc. Mao Zedong valued Red Chamber very much and gave the highest mark to it.  This book accompanied him throughout the Long March.  And he had ever said that you needed to read it at least 3 times to have a better understanding of Red Chamber (as well as Chinese culture, value, strategy and political thinking).

Life is imperfect. Imperfection is great

Since its publication, no one has the full and complete version of Red Chamber. It has never been completed and its imperfection makes it even great which leaves many rooms for study, discussions, improvements and corrections.   Red Chamber not only has many names, it also has many versions and involved many people.  Since its publication more than 200 years go, many comments, researches, and studies have been carried out on various aspects of Red Chamber.  It has since become a Red Study (红学).

Red Chamber, as a family unit, is the refection of the society and people of early Qing dynasty. No other Chinese writings have ever given a complete picture of the time history as Red Chamber. It provides the first hand knowledge of the living, customs, family life/relationship, official and government politics and life of lower class people.  Their behaviors and how they mange life and face the political outcome are also well covered in the book.  From here, you will see different faces of Chinese, how they react under crisis, how they become poor and how they get promoted, how they do bad things, and how they mange a family.  All these show us the positive and negative aspects of Chinese characteristics.

How come George is not able to convince PAP to reform earlier?

Many things happened in the Red Chamber are beyond control.  You know the coming and you know the going but you are helpless and so you let go.  Is this what George read from the book and understand that he cannot push too hard for an early reform in the PAP?  Jia family’s misfortune is a fate. Does it also imply the defeat of George in GE2011 is a fate?

It is too early to predict the future of the PAP. However, as shown in Red Chamber, without reform, it will move from Tai Lai to Pi Ji. If you believe in fate, it may end like another Jai family and all the monkeys run away.

Tony and Jayakumar, both are right

By the PAP definition, the political reality in Singapore is that a President needs only to understand the complexity of the problems but must face the fact that he is powerless.  This can be further described in a dream and a stone like the Red Chamber.

It is a dream:
President lives in a dream and understands what is going on but … changes.

Asked by a reporter about speculation that he might be a candidate, the deputy chairman and executive director of the Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC), Tony Tan had this to say: 'Like all Singaporeans, I am watching the political climate closely.

'It is clear that the next president of Singapore will hold office during a period of enormous change. In such times, my view is that it is more important than ever to have a president with a steady hand and a deep understanding of the complexities behind each decision the president may have to make.' (ST)

A Dream of deep understanding of the complexities is required for the President, just like the stone from heaven, after traveling around China in the early Qing Dynasty; it had a good understanding of the complexities of the nation, society and people.  But it is just a fine memory ad understanding. Jia family was also facing enormous political change as there was an infighting of leadership.       

It is a stone:
President only has limited power like a stone in particular … expectation.

Reiterating the legal limits to presidential powers, former senior minister S. Jayakumar said it would be good for all Singaporeans - especially candidates - to understand the president's role, so that nobody held wrong expectations.

'I am a bit surprised and disappointed over some of the statements and claims made by some of the would-be candidates about what they intend to do if they get elected,' he said.

These statements, he noted, implied that they thought the president was 'a centre of power unto himself, distinct from the government of the day', and had 'certain executive powers'. (ST)

The power of the Elected President is just a piece of stone throwing into a pond, no impact at all to the government.  The stone is not a foundation or institution that can change the government decision making. Jia family is just servant to the Qing Dynasty and had to follow instructions.

So the reality of the Jia family is that it is just a ceremony, especially when the Emperor makes his visit to Jiangnan (Southern part of Yangtze River).

It is a ceremony jade:
President cannot have own policy agenda and has no executive power.

Law Minister K Shanmugam issued a detailed statement yesterday to outline the role of the head of state - including the fact that under the Constitution, the President "has no role to advance his own policy agenda" and that he is "not empowered to direct the investment strategies" of Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) and Temasek Holdings. (Today)

'Singapore has a parliamentary system of government, not a presidential one. The President is the head of state, not the head of government. The Prime Minister is the head of government and has the authority and responsibility to govern Singapore.' (Asiaone)

How will George consider his political journey?

No matter whether George decides to run for President or not, (or some one else is running), the future position of Singapore President will be a dream, a stone and a ceremony jade.
 
Surely George is thinking very hard whether he likes to live in a dream, act like a stone, or as shown like a jade in Singapore political history.

Perhaps, after the reality check, when George returns to Singapore after his short break, it is better for him to remain in the sweet dream of a foreign minister rather than returning to heaven like a jade stone.

(End of the 3-part series)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...