否极泰来 Piji Tailai

  Would it be better for  a young and potential minister  chairing the AI Council? AI is for the future generation.   Singapore is going to establish a National AI Council chaired by the prime minister.  Why not make it an opportunity for the 5th generation leaders who are young to lead and show their potential?   AI needs a new set of critical thinking.  Currently, we are using PORMA to challenge thinking. One side story from the government telling the truth.  No matter what, PORMA will help the database to generate and create different thinking and you can’t stop people from asking why?    AI looks for the big picture.  Not sure, PORMA is big enough to cover the big Singapore story. 

  部长薪资与财富差距问题 高薪使部长们能购置更多房产。房价上涨催生更多财富，进而拉大贫富差距。 房价涨幅远超收入增速，财富不平等远大于收入不平等便不足为奇。 谁能轻松购房投资？华语俗谚中"第一桶金"之说，不妨估算部长们积累首桶金的速度？这说的可不是奥运金牌，而是真金白银啊。

  The Workers' Party: Forward, backward, or status quo? The Pritam Singh question? The evolution of WP from a single seat party to now having 12 seats in parliament shows WP is no more a regional party but a national issue.  The LO issue confirms it does matter in Singapore as well as for the PAP and WP .      Does the AI era provide opportunities to the oppositions?  How does the PAP react and maintain her super majority?  And also how WP and other alternative parties survive in a political monopoly? How WP handles the Pritam Singh question is not only the interest of WP, the PAP  but also the future of political development. The PAP has her agenda when they remove the LO.  How will WP respond and answer?  It looks like a game replay, history repeats.  But in an AI era, changes happen more often than before.  Who will benefit from the Pritam Singh question?  Will WP find a new solution, strategy to counter the simila...

  幼稚？天真？ 不再面对面，难道不能发问吗？ 横眉冷对，座位移动，会影响提问吗？应该问的还是会问，需要答的，还是要答，逃避的了吗？ 既然没有反对党领袖，座位是否应该悬空？由另一个行动党议员顶上，不会感觉不伦不类吗？ 千夫指，指的是天真还是幼稚？ 天真的认为，自导自演，没人看穿。 幼稚的行为，垄断国会，才能造出。 讽刺还是巧合？失败的政治逃兵，在国会面对面胜利者！

  Money no enough! Budget after budget. Vouchers after vouchers. Discounts after discounts. Subsidies after subsidies. Still. Money is not enough! 

  Well done! 做得好！ 拒绝有理、有利、有勇气！ 不提名反对党领袖，在一定程度上，有民意基础： 78%雅虎民调显示，不同意总理的做法。虽然，这只是网上的民调。不知道，咖啡店和小贩中心的反应，是否同步？ 一山不容二虎。国会内一个头，国会外一个头。这似乎在搞分裂，工人党中央的声明，不但拒绝提名，也强调反对搞分裂、分权活动。 原本的1个半新加坡国会政党苗头，在这一轮操作下，连半个都没有了，回归一党独大。 选民们如果认可反对党领袖，下次大选，可要做出明确选择，不能，总要马儿跑，又不让马儿吃草！