Skip to main content

Less George, Less Yin for the PAP – Part 1 (From the view points of Yin and Yang)

Less George, Less Yin for the PAP – Part 1
(From the view points of Yin and Yang)

I wanted to write about George Yeo ever since I noticed his liking of Laozi, Red Chamber, Three Kingdoms and the Art of War in his facebook.  It seems to me he is a person who posses and moves along “Yin” principles and uses negative/creative thinking in problem solving in his daily life, a contrast to majority of the PAP (People’s Action Party) leaders.

Mr. Shanmugan, the new foreign minister, described George as a unique person and even irreplaceable. He said, "George is a polymath, a uniquely gifted individual of a type who comes along once in several generations. Interested in history, culture, a thinker, a true renaissance man. I can go on. But perhaps all that needs to be said is: He is irreplaceable," (Yahoo! News)

No more a minister, George continues to show interest in the Nalanda project. As asked in an interview, he reaffirmed his strong commitment to the project and will visit Bihar at a later time. Nalanda (Bihar, India) is the ancient Buddhist seat of learning that predates Oxford University by several hundred years.

Politics, Culture and Yin-Yang

Is a cultured man necessary a “Yin” guy? Not necessary.  Confucius and Mengzi and other Confucianism followers are usually considered promoters of Yang – creative principle and other scholars in particular, philosophical Daoism like Laozi and Zhuangzi are considered promoters of Yin – receptive principle.

Now, you may guess in the PAP leadership, who is Yang and who is Yin and why the missing of George Yeo will create even more imbalance to the Yin-Yang principles in the Cabinet.

And as what Mr. Shanmugan said George was irreplaceable, so the damage to the PAP new Cabinet must be very serious and PM Lee has to make decisive decision to bring back the Yin-Yang balance and LISTENING is the way to do it.

Book of changes and Yin-Yang

So, what is Yin and what is Yang? Yang is creative (active, aggressive) principle and Yin is receptive (inactive, passive) principle. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Ching#Trigrams)

Here we are talking about Chinese philosophy and the Book of Changes.  (Yi Jing or I-Ching). Not so much on the religion Daoism or the fortune teller aspects of Yi Jing.

In one paragraph, Yi Jing (易经) is a collection of accumulated life experiences civilizationof Chinese people prior to the Zhou (周)Dynasty. It began its written form at the beginning of Zhou and before the written form; it used symbols as below to describe the relationship between Heaven, Man and Earth. Confucius wrote the explanation of Yi Jing and it is called Yi Zhuan (易传) and after that the interpretation and analysis of Yi Jing and Yin Zhuan become a filed of study (Yi Xue 易学) until now.

There are only 2 symbols: Yin (- -) and Yang (_). It then developed into 8 Gua (trigrams) and with the combinations of 2 trigrams; it developed into 64 Gua (hexagrams).    

Yin and Yang, everyone has it and uses it everyday

To give a simple example, you take out a coin or a dollar note, the front is Yang and the back is Yin. Every man and woman is playing Yin and Yang role throughout the day. A female CEO is acting Yang role when in office. However, when she returns home, she is a mother and she is playing a Yin role. On other hand, a junior male staff working under a female CEO, he is playing a Yin role in office and when reaches home, he is a father and becomes a Yang force.  

So, Yin or Yang depends on your position, sex, timing, location, environment, relationship, comparison …etc. 

It is very difficult for a person to be purely Yin (total receptive, passive) or Yang (total creative or active). Usually, you have both, but with more Yin than Yang or Yang than Yin. And that affects the outcome as in the case of Tin vs. Nicole.

Tin vs. Nicole. Who has more Yin and Yang?

When both Tin Pei Ling and Nicole Seah stood for election in GE2011, both of them were acting the Yang role.  However, when they return to their respective offices, they are back to Yin role as both are not at the management level. During the campaign, we noticed that Nicole was listening and even crying when she learned about the sad story of a lady – a reaction of Yin.  While Tin reacted quite differently, especially over the internet, and showed her Yang force.  Perhaps, her resignation from Ernst & Young and wanting to spend more time with the residents of MacPherson can show and reflect her Yin force.

Yin is more welcome

Both Tin and Nicole seems strong in character (you need that if you are standing for election) and have more Yang elements as reported in the media. Why is it Nicole is more welcome than Tin throughout GE2011 until now?

The great difference is Nicole shows her Yin elements more often than Tin. It may also be that she has more Yin than Yang as compared to Tin. Or she shows more of her Yin side than that of Tin. People like Nicole’s Yin shows of caring of the sick, poor and old. She also connects well with the young voters. Listening is a key composition of Yin. And Nicole is positioning her listening role. (So do the PAP after the election). 

Personally, I have reservation about Tin’s declaration that she is not expected to have baby this year.  Why not? Motherhood is a true reflection of Yin and pregnancy will lead to more understanding of problems faced by the married women with children.  She can use the opportunity to gain back voters.      

Why WP won Aljunied GRC while George is play Yin role

By the analysis of Tin vs. Nicole, George led PAP team should win the Aljunied GRC as he is playing the Yin role. 
While the WP team led by Low Thia Khiang is projected as a Yang force and wanting to kill a tiger. 

Here we have to consider how an individual and a team work and the outside environment.  No one will have doubt that George will win if he stands in a SMC or even other GRCs. In the case of Tin v Nicole, Nicole will have high chance to win if it is a SMC contest.

However, GRC is a team work. WP team has a better Yin-Yang balance while PAP team has more Yin than Yang.  Perhaps with the exception of Cynthia, the rest of the PAP team is mainly Yin elements.

When you are fighting for survival, making a breakthrough, the team with Yang force or better Yin-Yang balance will win. 
In addition, the outside environment (the expectation of Singaporeans) raised the battle level to a national level rather than a local issue.

Typical example of Yang in GE2011

 

Aljunied has five years to 'repent' if it chooses WP: MM

Speaking at PAP's Radin Mas branch on Saturday, Singapore's founding father said the PAP will not lose in this election, as the only hot-seat is Aljunied.

But he said, "If Aljunied decides to go that way, well Aljunied has five years to live and repent." (sg.news.yahoo)

Typical example of Yin in GE2011

 

PM Lee: I'm sorry for our mistakes

"If we didn't get it right, I'm sorry. But we will try better the next time."
It was an apology that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong saw fit to repeat twice on Tuesday during the People's Action Party (PAP) first lunchtime rally at Boat Quay next to UOB Plaza. (sg.news.yahoo)

After seeing these two typical examples and the rest is history.  It tells the power of Yin which is usually associated to the people and Yang is more related to ruler and management. But without the support of Yin (people), how can Yang perform?

A Cabinet of Yang principled ministers. Is it a danger?

So in a cabinet, if all the ministers want to act aggressive like Yang forces, then the decision making will tend to be lack of Yin considerations.

This is why George is considered important balancing force (in addition to his seniority and experience) in the Cabinet as he can contribute and provide Yin elements and principles to the Cabinet.  This is why the vacuum left by George is so big that forces the PAP government to listen attentively, willing to make U-turn and even willing to cut their pay package.

What are Yang principled policies that need change?

This is what PM Lee said in his swearing-in ceremony speech:

“At the same time, it is clear that Singaporeans do have significant concerns over both the substance of Government policies and the way they are implemented. There are anxieties over specific areas such as housing, healthcare and immigration. Many groups want the Government to be more responsive to their difficulties and predicaments – retirees, single parents, the middle class and young adults, even students.

So, we are expecting changes in the GDP growth model with the support of foreign talent policy; the HDB flats; and the hospital and medical care.   

Howeverit is difficult to change a person or an environment that in the past 50 years keep on emphasizing Yang principles like, money, perfect scores, A team, go to JB for sick and old, media restriction, ISA, productivity, etc. 

At the moment, “wait and see” is the answer.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...