Skip to main content

Will non-English speaking voters be the king makers in this Presidential electionr ?



By now, it is quite clear who they are going to vote in the coming Presidential election for the majority of the English speaking voters. The young and educated will go for a non-PAP endorsed candidate. The rich, elites plus the conservative and civil servants will likely to vote for Tony Tan.

What happened to non-English speaking voters? How big is their share in the total votes? Who is their preferred candidate?  It seems that this group of voters are neglected by the candidates as well as the social media.

There is no Roundtable discussion, Face-to-Face exchanges and CNA discussion program on Presidential candidates in other languages other than English.  But we are in 4-corner fight and a significant change of mind in these voters will certainly affect the results. 

Non-English speaking voters are important

Therefore, their votes are important. Their share in the total votes is very high.  It can be as low as 30% and as high as 50% depending on different definition. So, why are they not involved or not informed? Is it done on purpose? And who is benefiting from the inaction? 

Dr Tony Tan, of course.

He is the established brand name in the market. In Chinese, he is an old trade mark.  Although he can not speak mandarin well, many senior citizens, especially old ladies, like him.  He is like a trusted brand and will have the support of this group of voters. 

And these voters are not interested in the discussions in Roundtable, Face-to-Face, CNA, or even social media. But one man one vote, whoever has the most votes will win.

Example of Aljunied and Bukit Timah-Holland

In the recent GE in May, why there is a breakthrough in Aljunied and not Bukit-Timah-Holland?  Besides the SDP brand name, there are other reasons too. 

It is understood that the SDP team put up a good fight in the middle and upper class area but not the HDB estates.  While the WP team scored an overall win in all areas.

So, the SDP team lost because of the non-English speaking voters in the HDB areas. And when you compare the two teams, the WP teams can certainly reach out to the HDB voters easily because they speak their language. 

How can 4 English speaking candidates reach out to non-English speaking voters?   

Doing nothing is to the benefit of Tony Tan even though he (and also Tan Cheng Bock) can hardly speak a word of Mandarin (even though he was once Minister for Education).  

Jee Say and Kin Lian should try to reach out to these voters. At least they can speak better Mandarin and dialects than Tony. They should take advantage of their strength in this area, perhaps also in their coming rally.

Voters, with better informed information, will ignore the endorsements of clan associations, chambers, unions, etc. and make their own judgement.  But the local controlled newspapers and television can influence the non-English speaking voters everyday. 

Confidence for Tony and PM Lee

Even PM Lee is doing it indirectly when he warned that Singapore is too small to afford political paralysis, especially the loss of confidence by investors, by the markets.

Does it sound like Tony’s Confidence for the Future?

Speaking at the Ang Mo Kio-Hougang National Day Dinner, PM Lee reminded Singaporeans (in particular to non-English speaking voters): "We are too small to be able to afford impasse and gridlock, to have two sides blocking one another so you can't move, you can't solve problems, you can't go ahead. We have to work together. The government is doing our part, we need voters, we need every citizen to do their part." (CNA)

Needless to say, he wants to send the ‘right’ message to non-English speaking voters through the local media. His warning and reminder are to keep them stay put and vote for the establishment endorsed candidate. 

Don’t under-estimate non-English speaking voters

An under-estimation of non-English speaking voters will cause any candidate dearly.  Tony knows he will benefit from the inaction of other candidates as the government and the state media will help him to campaign. 

Non-English speaking voters should include Chinese, Malay and Indian voters. They want to hear the candidates and their views on the role of the Elected President.

Act now before it is too late.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...