Skip to main content

Does Dr Tony Tan really have the economic and finance brain for the coming crisis?


When the West is looking for China and India for solutions for their economic and financial problems, does Tony Tan have any knowledge about these two countries?  All we know about is his unimpressive performance at the GIC.

We know Goh Chok Tong knows something about India and Lee Kuan Yew is recognised by the West to be a Chinese expert.  But there is no mention of Dr Tony Tan having any special knowledge on these two countries.  In the TOC’s Face to Face, he even could not remember a famous phrase of Mao and quickly pronounced he was not a …

For the past 30 years, Dr Tony Tan is associated with the economic success (as well as the setback) of Singapore. We are one of the most successful models for capitalism in the world, even the west is very envy of us.  Our latest attempt to boost our economy is still a continuation of western model and will result to even bigger gap between rich and poor.

The West now acknowledges the shortfall of their economic strategies and options of the past and is looking for new solutions, including inputs from the East and Latin America

New model for Singapore but can he contributes?

In his speech at SMU Dr Tony Tan recognised that Singapore has reached a level that we need to seek new model and route for our economy.  However, his western trained knowledge in finance and economic may not be suitable for future Singapore.  Instead, it could be an obstacle and provides wrong advices just like what he did in the GIC.

He said he was an experienced hand in the financial world and claimed that he would be the best candidate to handle an economic storm.

“With my background in these areas,” he touted, “and with the knowledge which I have of the financial market, and the global economy, I believe that I will be able to make the contribution to and help the government and the ministers…to understand the situation better because I worked in these fields for the last 20 years.”

His offer at the lunch rally is another western solution

He is going to speak at the lunch rally on economic situation and jobs.  Again, from the western perspective, I think and I believe.

Do we still need an outdated western model to solve today’s economic problems?

And even you want to go back to the fundamental, for Dr Tony Tan, his fundamental is his western education.  No wonder he only knows how to invest in the USA, however, even his US investments do not generate good income for Singapore reserve.

So when the wave is moving to the East, how can Dr Tony Tan help Singapore to benefit from the wind change?  If the government takes his advice and the reserve will 输得更惨 (loses even more money).

Dr Tony Tan’s strength in economic and finance after all is not a great deal and Singapore will not benefit for having him as President.  Furthermore, he is only professionally trained in physics and mathematics.

A western trained economist with the understanding of the East can give and provide better solutions to Singapore, not Dr Tony Tan if we really need one.

However, within Singapore, we need to look for a caring President. It is better for voters to put on a pair of glasses to look for a heart – a missing heart hiding some ways in the past 50 years. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...