Skip to main content

CHANGE: Koh good as Welfare Committee Chief?



<Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who was one of the rally speakers, said he intends to appoint Dr Koh to the Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council’s Welfare Committee, “to look into how we can better assist those residents who are facing financial difficulties”.>
- Today 19 Jan 2012

Comparing to the previous parliament speaker Palmer, the new PAP candidate, Dr Koh Poh Koon, is unlikely to make any impact in the Parliament or raise any national issues.  Instead, he is likely to chair a Welfare Committee in a town council.

Perhaps, PM Lee realises that it is not enough to attract Punggol East voters.  Just one night, less than 24 hours, the PAP has improved the offer. Now, PM Lee sees him differently and intends to appoint him to a suitable political office.     
<He has told Dr Koh that his first priority is to fight and win in Punggol East. “But I think that he can make a contribution not just in Punggol East but more broadly.” If he is elected and when he is ready, PM Lee said that he intends to appoint Dr Koh to a suitable political office.> (http://www.singapolitics.sg/news/pm-lee-dr-koh-has-ability-be-more-mp)

What is the meaning of “a suitable political office”? Is this a promise or just a by-election promise? After a good night sleep, Dr Koh has his potential moved up to a higher level. By the end of short campaign period, not to be surprised, the PAP may claim that Dr Koh has the potential to be a minister.

Hope, Family, Action – the limitation to change

The theme of Dr Koh’s rally speech last night concentrated on hope, family and action. These three values, in fact, have very strong link with the housing problem. We may use this as an example for discussion. 
<National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan says "plenty" of housing units are coming on stream, with about 200,000 units to be built by 2016.
Of these, about 80,000 are private properties, 10,000 are Executive Condominiums and 110,000 are HDB units.>http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1248760/1/.html

The 200,000 new homes are 40% private properties, 5% EC apartments and 55% HDB units.  In Singapore, about 85% of the population are staying in HDB flats.  The newly built HDB flats by 2016 are only accounted for 55% of the total new homes.

What does it mean? Income of Singaporeans will continue to go up in the next few years so that they can afford to buy private properties and ECs.  Or the 40% private properties are for investors, local and foreign. From 85% down to 55% of HDB flats (supply), will Dr Koh raise the issue and help to break the poverty cycle?

No. These are national issues. Hope, family and action are all national issues and there is a limit Dr Koh can change them.  As an ordinary MP if elected, there is not much he can do in a national level.  

Hence, if he is elected, he will perform the job of welfare committee chairman. 
<"As your voice in Parliament, I will speak on issues that matter to you. I will push for more help, for our fellow citizens in need, the poor, the vulnerable and especially the elderly who have done so much for our society to make it what it is today. 
"I will bring up practical issues that families face, on education, on childcare, on the cost of living. I will do all I can to push for policies to help more individuals and families to stand on their own two feet. I want to see more opportunities for all to succeed, the same opportunities given to me.">http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1248812/1/.html
  
Punggol East voters should assess and evaluate Dr Koh’s ability and limitation. Do they really need a person to just in charge of welfare, and not to make changes to society?    

PM Lee likes SDP

PM Lee questioned the performance of Workers’ Party in the Parliament.  Perhaps, he likes the idea of Singapore Democratic Party. SDP’s proposal to WP was to speak in the Parliament and left the town council management to WP.  May be he prefer a SDP candidate to stand in the Punggol East by-election.  Unfortunately, his sweet hope was not materialised and he felt disappointed.   
<"I don't see any strong views or alternatives being presented by the opposition, whether it's the NCMPs or the elected MPs," said the PM during a morning walkabout in drizzling rain.
"We are doing things on a national level," he added, building on the same vein as several other People's Action Party speakers during a rally the previous night on Friday.> http://sg.news.yahoo.com/pm-lee--what-has-wp-done-since-being-elected-to-parliament--024313137.html

However, WP thinks they have made contributions in two areas.
<One, ordinary folk now have more say in governance, an improvement from when the country was run by an elite class under the People's Action Party (PAP), with little accountability and transparency, he said.
 Two, the WP has championed a more humane society, where a First World nation extends beyond materialistic and elitist goals. "We have seen some changes in that direction," said Mr Low without elaborating.>http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/punggol-east-election/story/wp-will-keep-close-watch-over-govt-20130119

Anyway, PM Lee moves the debate and campaign in Punggol East by-election to national level. This is certainly different from the job of Welfare Committee.  Then, voters have to judge Dr Koh’s ability to voice out in Parliament too, not just local issues and welfare.  In addition, voters should also judge the two contributions that WP mentioned are valid or not.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...