Skip to main content

Has China changed after May Fourth Movement?



Yes and no. Today is May 4.  In 1919, the student movement in Peking (Beijing) had helped to change modern China in many ways: political, social, cultural and even the government. For more information, please visit

However, as compared to more than 5,000 years of Chinese history, what are the real significant changes over the past 100 years after the fall of Qing dynasty. From dynasty to no dynasty, from one man rule to one party rule, what really have changed?

Many attribute the Chinese achievement to economic development. For this, we are only looking at the recent history.  China is now the number two economy in the world. Not to forget, she used to be number one for several hundred if not thousand years in history.  Even the military weak Song dynasty, its economy could be as big as one-third of the world economy.

This is why people mentioned (and emphasised) about the Chinese century in 21st century.  If history is to repeat itself, then not only China will be number one economy in the world, a substantial percentage of world economic activities will also in the hand of Chinese.  No wonder Obama has to adopt practical diplomacy towards China. 

To have a better understanding of Chinese civilisation and achievements in the past, you may visit the following website for a 10-part series that took 8 years to produce.   

Economic performance is the most important and significant KPI for China so far.  Besides economy, it seems there is nothing China can show off to the world. However, based on historical data, China has a huge potential to grow and has many unexposed values.  It is an under value ‘share’ and commends a potential growth that is beyond our imagination, especially as suggested by Wen Jia Bao - economic restructure has to come with political restructure.

To China as a whole, the past 100 years as compared to Chinese history, the achievements so far are not that fantastic after all.  The political development has not achieved any breakthrough.  Even though one man rule has gone, the DNA of this practise still remains as the case of Bo Xilai and many others. Corruptions, suppression, inequality, cultural achievements and many other developments are no better than before.  It is not the golden era of China.

Chinese are used to be proud of their culture, literature, arts and music. However, we don’t see great writers, artists, or musicians after 1949. There were some famous ones in the first half of last century.  However, comparing to those great writers, artists, and even scientists, the last century as well as the 19th century were really the dark days in Chinese history.              

Ironically, Chinese believe in the turn of fortune(风水轮流转).  If you are down by 200 years, then you will be up for the next 200 years. That is why even fenshui also predicts the coming of Chinese century.

On the positive and optimistic side, China will under go changes. Change and adoption of changes, comprises are part of the Chinese philosophy and history. Politically, after so many bad practises of the Communists’ Party, it will be hard for Chinese people to see the same CPC again. We have seen in Taiwan the changes of the Nationalists. Perhaps, Taiwan can serve as a mirror to China – a step to modern China.

Many of the officials and party leaders in China today have power and authority even more than that of Qing and other dynasties and their ethics, however, is much worst and lower.  This certainly is not the condition for a golden era of China.  Chinese, inside and outside of China, are witnessing this and demand a change openly or quietly.  

May Fourth is also a new cultural movement.
Unfortunately, we see only the destruction caused by the Cultural Revolution. The introduction of simplified Chinese and Hanyu Pinyin may have helped more people to learn Chinese but it also creates a distance from learning the ancient wisdom. And the Confucius Institute has yet to produce any significant result.

Judging from the historical perspective, the current achievements of China or the ruling CPC is normal.  The country (not necessary the party) is on course towards a better tomorrow.  It may face another setback, like June 4, or cultural revolution, but the long term perspective is still positive. 

In years to come, the new norm for China is to see more and more achievements and influences in cultural, social, economic and even political developments.

The May Fourth Movement is just a beginning of a long march – in Chinese history we may not see significant changes in 100 years. But how many of us can live more than 100 years!  For this to happen, we will have to born at the right time. (生要逢时)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...