Skip to main content

From attacking WP to attacking YSL so to make the BE local


And also ‘you go low key, I also go low key’ to make it a local election.

Only u HG 不离不弃后港情4

There is a strategic shift for the PAP in Hougang by-election.  Suddenly, they realise that even they have full coverage in the main stream media, there are after all only more than 23,000 voters in Hougang.  Only Hougang voters can vote in the BE.

The PAP wants to make it a local election but with national coverage of MSM of PAP candidate, it is no more a local coverage.  Its intention to limit the BE to Hougang is not working. Hence, they are now shifting to new strategies:

-     Attacking YSL rather than WP as WP is a national political party.
-     Changing to low key approach because only local Hougang voters can vote.  

It is the usual way of the PAP: saying one thing and doing another thing. Now you can clearly see their colour and double heads.   

Let’s look at the time line of attacking WP and YSL first:

16 Feb 2012
Khaw Boon Wan attacking WP and YSL

PAP chairman and Minister for National Development Mr Khaw Boon Wan said the Workers' Party (WP) should come clean with the people on expelled WP member Yaw Shin Leong's alleged extramarital affair.

The New Paper reported today that Mr Khaw expressed surprise with the WP's "sudden U-turn" of expelling Mr Yaw from the party when the WP leadership had stood shoulder to shoulder in solidarity with him at the party's Chinese New Year dinner. (Asiaone)

9 May 2012
Lee Hsien Loong on calling BE at Hougang continued his attack on WP and YSL

Mr Lee also gave a quick run-down of what had happened in Hougang.

The WP and Mr Yaw, he said, had not given Singaporeans 'a full and proper account of what happened'. He said: 'Both the WP and Mr Yaw have let down all those who voted for him.' (ST)

16 May 2012
Khaw Boon Wan on nomination centre attacking only YSL

Mr Khaw noted that Hougang has been served by the Workers' Party's (WP) Low Thia Khiang for 20 years.

"Last year, he moved on and handed it over to Yaw Shin Leong. Unfortunately, Mr Yaw got into trouble, disgraced himself and disappointed all the voters. And the worse thing is leave just like that without a word - not a single word of explanation or apology. I find that utterly irresponsible and in fact, arrogant, taking the voters for granted," said Mr Khaw.  (channelnewsasia)

The more the PAP is attacking WP, the more the Hougang BE will become a national mini-referendum of the past one year of the PAP government. Since YSL was the former local MP, attacking YSL is sufficient.  

You low key I low key no wonder this is a Low constituency

Even though WP never admits this BE is a local election, however, as an old hand in Hougang, they know too well who have the voting rights. They are happy to see the PAP classifying the BE as local but making it big likes a national one (with the help of MSM).  

So, WP candidate for Hougang BE is a down to earth person.  Since the announcement of BE, Ah Huat is a low key man.

[The Workers' Party candidate for Hougang, Png Eng Huat, said he's running a "no-frills and low key, ground" campaign.

Relying less on social media, Mr Png said he prefers to speak to residents personally, going door-to-door.  (channelnewsasia, 16 May)]

However, Ah Choo, the PAP candidate for Hougang is ‘I am my own man’.  He even has his own slogan "Always here for you".  But today, he too is shifting to low key approach of campaigning.  He has no activities for the MSM. As reported in Shinmin, most of his activities will shift to low key.  

[朱倍庆在提名日之前有不少公开活动,连续数天都在媒体上曝光,但首个竞选期的早上,他却出现没有让媒体可采访的活动。
据《新明日报》了解,朱倍庆团队并非停止竞选活动,而是将大部分活动改为低调进行。 (omy.sg 17 May)]

Why is he making a U-turn?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...