Skip to main content

Don’t judge a person by his language ability


Memory of Deyi 2                                            


Don’t judge a person by his language ability


“Of course, my English is not as good as MM Lee’s. But, his Chinese is definitely not better than mine. “ - Low Thia Khiang


I was at the Deyi nomination centre to show support to the oppositions. And I was glad that I had witnessed a very important event and a historical  moment in Singapore history. There were two sitting opposition MPs venturing out of SMC to contest in GRC. And there was a possibility that Singapore would end with no elected opposition MP in the House. The result as shown in GE 2011 is now a history - a sweet memory.

While taking photos, I noticed a not so perfect (left) ear of Low Thia Khiang.   I though this was born like this only until I read the posting of ‘overcoming the deafening silence’ http://enquirer.sg/2009/01/19/overcoming-the-deafening-silence/

Low Thia Khiang at the nomination centre

Low injured his ear during his NS as disclosed in the post. In fact, it was quite common for NS men to get ear injuries in the earlier years of National Service as the protection was not as good as today. 

Another President’s scholar was out and down

George Yeo is the second President’s scholar, after the defeat of Mah Bow Tan in Potong Pasir, to be defeated in a general election. 

The success of WP team in Aljunied is of course a team work but without Low, there is no guarantee that WP would win the race so handsomely with certainty. A Chinese educated Low led a team of underdogs beat the English elites led by a President’s scholar in Singapore.  Is this a double defeat for the PAP? A common man poor in English and a non scholar beat an elite scholar who has good command of English.

Hearts are not won by good English

No wonder Lee Kuan Yew got so angry. How can a third-class (Nanyang) university graduate, likes Low, beat a President’s and SAF scholar, likes George Yeo, who graduated from Cambridge and Harvard? 

People, who know about the history of Chinese education and Nantah in Singapore, will think this is a mission impossible.  With the hard work of Low, quietly serving in Hougang SMC for 20 years, he finally breaks a GRC and makes history in Singapore.  

The government and the PAP have spent millions of dollars training all these elites to take over the running of the country and now suddenly they are not sure of wining in the election. Are tax payers money well spent? Or are the PAP training paper generals for the election?

Just like Chiam See Tong said he got only 5 ‘O’ levels but he defeated a President scholar in Potong Pasir.  More are to be expected in the coming election.

PAP supporters marching out of Deyi Nomination Centre 

A re-run for coming PE?

What’s wrong in Singapore?  The best educated elites from the PAP cannot win the hearts of the people. And people who spoke broken English or less perfect English won the race.

Will there be a repeat in the coming presidential election?  Tan Kin Lian who speaks less perfect English is closer to the people and beat Tony Tan who is proficiency in the English language but keeps himself a distance away from the common men and women. 

Go beyond English first

If you look around our local entrepreneurs, especially those older generations, and you will realize how good their English are. They may not speak good English but they are intelligent, smart and they employ many graduates, some even elites or at least from elite schools.

With the passing of Lee Kuan Yew’s era, we really need to re-look our English first policy.  In markets like China, South East Asia, and even India, the knowledge of local language and culture is far more important than the good English that our education system claimed to produce.

Indeed, we are doing in out universities and research institutes already.

English first or research first

Many have complained the English standard of our foreign imported lecturers, professors and researchers in our local universities.

The PAP is quite double standard in this aspect.  When they want high quality researchers, they are not so concern about their English proficiency. They want local universities to have quality research papers published in international journals or magazines.

By doing so, they are quite flexible. The English first approach can now change to research first.  Who know, in the near future, it can be baby first, foreign first or money first (oh, they have been doing so already)?   

Will they one day dare to acknowledge People First?  However, it is not decided by the PAP but by the People Power of Singaporeans.  

Comments

  1. I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

    Most people can see and hear that Low Thia Kiang's first language is Chinese. So his English is not as good as his Chinese, but his Chinese is of a high standard. I respect him for that.

    The problem with most (Chinese) Singaporeans is that they have a low standard in both languages, English and Chinese.

    When I look at Low Thia Kiang, I don't think '3rd class honours from Nantah' as you have described. To me, he actually exemplifies the Confucian gentleman, jun1 zi3.

    I also don't think it is as simple as 'WP underdogs' vs 'PAP elites'. After all, Chen Show Mao on paper looks exactly like a PAP elite. And if you want to say Low beat Yeo, you might as well say Chen Show Mao beat George Yeo. So Stanford/Oxford beat Cambridge/Harvard. That's completely illogical.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...