Skip to main content

Taidu, Gangdu, …..Singadu? How independence is Singapore? - The coming of a new Singapore independence movement.


Taidu (Taiwan independence #1
台独), Gangdu (Hong Kong independence#2港独), and now Singadu (Singapore independence 新独) This is a very unfortunate development because Singapore has been an independent country since 1965. We are different from Taiwan and Hong Kong.   Why do people here still want to have independent thinking mind?
A new political independent movement away from the ruling PAP is emerging quicker than expected.   Or if you look at it from the other sides from Taiwan and Hong Kong, it is certainly slower than expected. Here we are not discussing whether the “independent mind” of Taiwan and Hong Kong people is right or wrong, however, their desires and expressions of freedom, rights, and “emotional hump” #3 are relevant to us.  It shows that a developed society has to accept different ideas and views and the monopoly of thinking is an out of date public policy of Singapore.

Despite Taidu or Gangdu, both Tiawan and Hong Kong never go down in history. Both regions continue to have economic growth and people there are having same quality of life if not better than Singapore although their GNP per capita is lower than us.  All three never end up like the situation in the Middle East.  Why?

Note on Singadu 
For uniquely Singapore, it is better to use Singadu rather than Xindu.  Whether Taidu or Gangdu, both are within the Chinese Greater China family under current political and economic climate.  Singapore is certainly not within the Greater China family and politically, we are an independent country. Singadu movement can take many forms.  Some may want a total change of the government.  Some want to teach the PAP a lesson.  Some wants only improvements in services.  Some just want the PAP to listen through National Conversation.  Anyway, there is no return to the past – the one party one man rule.

There are special reasons (#1#2) for the making of Taidu and Gangdu, so do the Singadu in Singapore.   In Singapore, the high-handed PAP has slowed down the independent movement but ultimately it has arrived.  And the arrival has a new term as described by a PAP MP – Political Tsunami. #4

Why, despite being an independent state, Singaporeans do not feel the independency?   In my previous post, “Political Tsunami, the PAP is just another East India Company”,
http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2013/02/political-tsunami-pap-is-just-another.html the arguments are the PAP & Co rules Singapore like a business and the Parliament is acting like the British parliament during American Revolution, passing legislations regarding North America without any considerations to the local people.

Referring to the situation in Taiwan and Hong Kong, there must have some things that people there find uneasy towards the ruling KMT and Hong Kong CEO. KMT in fact does a reasonable good job.  Despite free election, they can still hold on to the power. However, if there is a free election in Hong Kong under one-man-one-vote system, the current CEO of Hong Kong will not likely to be elected. (Sound like the winner of our PE2011?)  

Independent minded Singaporeans are questioning the President whether he is doing the job of the Republic’s President.  And whether the President has protect the interest of Singapore core or not?

Singadu has to do with the Singapore core or citizen core of Lion city. The Population White Paper has made the PAP immigration policy unpopular.  However, without the independent thinking mind, the expression and desire against the 6.9 million people will not be so loud. In the past, the PAP could implement polices as they liked with or without the parliament debate.  Now, at least they come out with a white paper and allow discussions in the parliament.  However, this is not enough.  The citizen core wants more and more and more!

When the Singapore Parliament endorsed the Population White Paper against the wishes of the Singapore core, the consequence will be a political tsunami even the Straits Times has predicted a sad outcome for the PAP:

<There is much muttering about the PAP paying a political price in the next general election due in 2016, and predictions of it losing one-third or more of the 87 elected seats. 
More worrying, as several MPs pointed out, is a growing divisive "Us and Them" rhetoric that demonises the PAP Government.>#3

However, ST is quick to point out the division in Singapore.  First of all, who is dividing the Singaporeans?   When Singaporeans begin to have our own identity and the Singapore core has formed the independent mind of how this country should be run, unfortunately, the PAP still wants to control the direction of Singapore.

The PAP has to think very hard why their “heart” works are not appreciated by the Singapore core.   Independent minded Singaporeans will have second thought about Goh Chok Tong and Khaw Boon Wan.  Some may even laugh at them and doubt about their sincerity. 
<“These are tough, fundamental challenges which the PM and his ministers will have to resolve. They will have to do this not only intellectually and logically, but also emotionally and sensitively,” he said. “They will have to dispel people’s current and future fears, win their hearts and minds, while planning a better tomorrow for them.” 
  Goh also applauded Lee and his team for their “courage and leadership” in tabling the paper, saying it was “the responsible way to govern Singapore”.> 
http://www.singapolitics.sg/news/esm-goh-hails-pm-dealing-future-problems-early

People first, not growth first: Khaw 
<Given the intensive building programme, the minister said he was shocked by the opposition Workers' Party's proposal to freeze the foreign worker population immediately and for 8 years.
"That is throwing a spanner into my building plan. I will not be able to deliver the new flats as promised to 200,000 families," said Mr Khaw. 
"On behalf of these families, I ask the Workers' Party to please rethink your idea and your approach, please spare a thought for them. They are our people, fellow Singaporeans too and many of them are making plans to quickly have the keys to their homes so they can set up families and have babies. Please don't disrupt their plans."> 
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1252629/1/.html

The PAP cannot stop the Singadu movement.  Experiences in Taiwan and Hong Kong show that there are always noises and voices in the society.  Bad handling of citizen core issues like the Population White Paper will only made the Singadu stronger. And in the days to come, it may even take over the running of Singapore.     

In Greater China, Taidu or Gangdu will have a limitation to growth.  But in Singapore, we are already an independent country, there is no limit, there is no big brother overseeing us, Singadu as a slow starter will have a better future in the new independent Singapore!
#1

#2

#3


#4
http://www.straitstimes.com/microsites/parliament/story/suicide-pap-vs-euthanasia-spore-20130208


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...