Skip to main content

Options for stability, will the real Singaporeans come forward in time of need?


Whether it is sustainable population or sustainable economy, political stability is a key to Singapore’s future. But not to get me wrong, I am not talking about the stability of one-party rule and the option of PAP-only government for political stability in Singapore.

In fact, the continued monopoly of the PAP in parliament will be the contributing factor for political instability in Singapore.  The longer it stays in power, the longer it has out of proportion representation in the parliament, the more political unstable it will be.

Judging from the big turnout at Hong Lim Park against the Population White Paper, the time has come that the PAP will lose more parliamentary seats to the oppositions in the coming general elections. But how soon will there be an alternative government, especially when there is a PAP warned freak election?

What happen if it comes sooner than expected? Do we have enough true blue Singaporeans coming forward to serve the alternative government?

Yes, I believe so. 

There are several examples that shows political stability can be achieved if capable individuals can come forward to form the government without objections and interference from the President.  In fact, the President must have the courage and wisdom to make the stability possible like the Options below.

Option 1 Monti Cabinet in time of crisis#1
Monti cabinet was a non-elected government in Italy during the debt and euro crisis in 2012. The ultimate purpose of Monti's appointment was to save Italy from the eurozone sovereign debt crisis. #1

Do we have enough responsible non-elected and non-party men and women in Singapore standing up for Singapore during crisis? Yes.  I think so.  The President of Singapore has to assist and not block the forming of the alternative government.  

Singapore does have “Monti” quality persons in the private and public sectors.  In time of need, they should step forward to serve the country.

Option 2 Chief Judge as caretaker leader#2
<Panagiotis Pikrammenos, chief justice of the council of state, the country’s supreme administrative court, was sworn in as the country’s 184th prime minister by the Orthodox archbishop of Athens in the presence of President Karolos Papoulias, who selected him after party leaders failed to form a coalition government after nine days of wrangling.

Not a recognisable face for most Greeks, Mr Pikrammenos (67) succeeds the technocratic central banker Lucas Papademos to the post and his duties will be strictly limited to the organising of the elections.>#2

This is an unfortunate situation but for stability, a caretaker prime minister is needed for a hung parliament waiting for new election. Again, the President of Singapore must make the right decision to ensure the stability. 

Option 3 Prime Minister of Opposition party #3

<On March 29, 2000, President-elect Chen announced that Mr. Tang had been chosen as premier to head the new cabinet.[1] With his wide-ranging military and overseas assignments, Mr. Tang has extensive administrative experience and an international outlook, which has promoted relations with other countries and will be necessary for the new cabinet.

No longer a KMT member, Mr. Tang confirms the ideal that the new government will not be restricted to persons of any particular political party or ethnic group. Rather, the new government will include the best qualified individuals, who will be able to formulate effective domestic policies, enhance prospects for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and promote the ROC in the international community. During his tenure as premier from the opposition party, Mr. Tang had the highest domestic approval rating over all previous prime ministerial administrations. On October 3, 2000, Mr. Tang resigned from his post amid nuclear power row over Taiwan's energy policy.>#3

This is a case the alternative party is forming the government but can’t find a suitable and respectable prime minister.  In a temporary solution, the ruling party invites an experience opposition leader to be the prime minister of the new government, for example, George Yeo is leaving the PAP to lead the new government.

Option 4 Coalition government#4
<David Cameron formed the Cameron ministry after being invited by Queen Elizabeth II to begin a new government following the resignation of the previous Prime Minister of the United KingdomGordon Brown, on 11 May 2010. It is a coalition government, composed of members of both the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats. The government's Cabinet is made up of sixteen Conservatives and five Liberal Democrats with eight other Conservatives and one other Liberal Democrat attending cabinet but not members.[1] The Cameron Ministry is the first coalition government to have governed the United Kingdom since the Churchill War Ministry of the Second World War.>#4

This may be the worst case scenario.  The PAP is joining an opposition party to form the new government and continues to hold the prime ministership.  Voters may not be happy with this arrangement as they want to see a non-PAP government.  Of course, there can also be the PAP is a junior member in the coalition (due to few MP seats) and the prime ministership goes to the opposition.   Howevr, this is a remote possibility and the PAP may not accept it.

Option 5 Would you send in the army? #5
This is totally unacceptable in a democratic country. However, since the issue had been mentioned before, let see whether this is possible.

In order to do this, the scholar generals must be the ones leading this operation.  I doubt our paper generals have the guy to do this.  If you look at the quality of the generals joining the politics and judge whether they can command and control a platoon or a company of educated soldiers to take over the alternative government, I have great doubt.  

In social media, it is very difficult to convince JC, poly and even graduate NS soldiers to fight for you and die for you without a good reason.  Unless, the paper generals do the unthinkable - inviting foreign troops to Singapore!   

However, it is possible to have uncooperative senior civil servants.

Uncooperative senior civil servants     
I am not that pessimistic about it. In Taiwan, from a KMT President to a DPP President, there were some problems but the government administration had not been badly affected.   In Hong Kong, from British governor to Hong Kong CEO, the administration has not been affected.

Look at our neighbour, Malaysia, two important states changed government in the last election.  In Penang and Selangor states, the performance of the opposition state government is as good as the BN state governments if not better than them.  

If Hong Lim Park protest is an indication that voters are very unhappy with the PAP, then a freak election is possible in Singapore. However, we should not underestimate the potentials of Singaporeans, especially true blue citizens coming forward to serve the nation in time of need!  

#1
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monti_Cabinet

#2

#3

#4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_ministry

#5
http://catherinelim.sg/2009/09/03/sir-would-you-send-in-the-army/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...