Skip to main content

Must Singapore Fourth Prime Minister Come from the PAP?

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is going to talk about dream home in his National Day Speech
(如何打造一个美好的家园, Zaobao). According to his own plan to retire in 2020, he has only seven years left to build a dream home for Singaporeans. Hopefully, it is not another Swiss garden that Goh Chok Tong had promised us before.

Who will take over from him? Another People’s Action Party political leader or the oppositions.   Of course, it has to depend on the development of the promised land and dream home in coming years. Even he is doing a little better than Goh’s Swiss garden, voters will still not happy and want to vote the PAP out. Why? Take a look at our neighbours or even the world you will understand what I mean.

From Malaysia to Cambodia, their ruling parties are getting below 50% of the popular votes in the recently held elections. Will you dare to say in these two countries the ruling parties will still in power in the next elections? Remember, these two countries are having positive economic growth (growth rate even higher than Singapore).  According to the PM’s ‘right politics, right economics’ principles, voters in Malaysia and Cambodia should give a strong support to the ruling parties. Why don’t they?  Look around the world, it is hard to please the voters not to mention the PAP is a party refuses and rejects changes!

Independent analysis can also be a misleading analysis

Let examine the following principles:

P1: Singapore prime minister must come from the ruling party.
P2: The PAP is the ruling party and so the nominated PAP member will be appointed PM by the President.
Conclusion: Singapore 4th PM is from the PAP.

It is logical if and only if the PAP is a ruling party when PM Lee steps down in 2020. Then, the 4th PM of Singapore will come from the PAP.  Alternatively, he can do it just like what Goh did when he handled over power to PM Lee without a general election.  We don’t know the dates of the next two GEs. We also don’t know whether the PAP will be in power after 2020.

So, if there is an independent analysis forecasting the 4th PM is coming from Mr Chan or Mr Tan of the PAP, it can also be a misleading analysis. Its assumption is only valid if and only if the PAP is the ruling party not to mention whether there is any infighting for the PM post within the PAP or not. There is also another possibility that PM Lee will step down earlier than expected when the PAP is still a ruling party.  In this case, the logic of the 4th PM a PAP man is valid and one senior minister, not from the 2011 batch, will be the PM and not Mr Chan or Mr Tan.     

An analysis pointing the 4th PM is a PAP man can mean the early retirement of PM Lee or it can mean after 2020, the PAP will continue to win in GE.  Whichever it goes, it is projecting the next PM is from the PAP that itself may not be an independent analysis.  It leads readers to believe that the 4th PM is from the PAP and the PAP is still a ruling party at the time the 4th PM is being appointed by the President.

Which is a better arrangement? PM Lee steps down early to make way for the 4th PAP PM or the PAP takes a chance after 2020 to win in the GE. The PAP will then has to assess and judge the best strategy to ensure the 4th PM is a PAP man and the timing of PM Lee’s retirement. One example is in Australia. The Australian Labour Party has decided to let the former lady PM goes and appoints a new leader to fight and (hopefully) continues to stay in power in the coming GE.

After all it may not be so important whether the 4th PM is a PAP man or not.  Whoever can promise a better Singapore, a caring Singapore and an inclusive Singapore with better home and quality of life is deserved to be the 4th PM.  PM Lee is taking more than 1 week to draft his ‘dream home’ speech and what can we expect from him as he plans to bring in more super billionaires and enlarge the rich-poor gap.  Does he have a dream team to deliver his dream home?

Biased analysis may lead to independent thinking

For this, let think about flying the national flag of Singapore. Is this a state flag or a nation’s flag? Will you really go and burn the flag if you think this is state flag? No. You should think of the bonding, the association and the belongingness.  Who is the flag belong to? Why there is no bonding? What is the evolution from independence till now? When the grassroots leaders knock at your doors requesting you to fly the flag, if your answer is yes, you are in the dream home of PM Lee. Really? If your answer is no, you are bias. You don’t want and don’t accept the dream home offered by PM Lee. Really not?

We come back the the principles again:

P1: Singapore flag is designed and created by the ruling party.
P2: The PAP is the ruling party and so they are promoting the state flag to unify Singaporeans.
Conclusion: Singapore flag is associated with the PAP.

The principles and the conclusion are all true. However, the conclusion is not a good conclusion. The more the flag is associated to the PAP, the more Singaporeans want to keep a distance from the flag. It has nothing to do with the loyalty or bonding with Singapore. Without flying the state flag, you still serve national service, you still carry with you the pink identity card and the red passport.   So, this biased conclusion makes you think, think independently it is a state flag or a national flag. also, do you want to associate with the PAP by flying the flag?

A Singapore flag should belong to all Singaporeans and should not be associated with a political party. Unfortunately, the evolution proves it the other way. When it is associated with a party, like the Nazi or Japanese war time flag, it is only a symbol of the party, being used by the party leaders exclusively and not the people.  

Social media is bias and a ‘threat’

By the same analogy, the conclusion of social media in Singapore is not only bias but in addition, a ‘threat’ to national building and Total Defence.

Online misinformation, rumours and smears a 'threat' to Total Defence: Ng Eng Hen
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/online-misinformation-rumours-and-smears-threat-total-defence-ng-eng-h

As explained above a so-called independent analysis may lead to misleading conclusion and a bias analysis can make you think out of the box, we therefore have to judge the online news and analysis very objectively. A political statement by a minister may lead us to a wrong conclusion, just like flying the Singapore flag. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...