Skip to main content

Mitt Romney will win if he were in Singapore


With the help of our main stream media, Mitt Romney will win if he were in Singapore.

Mitt Romney is a perfect candidate of the PAP if he were in Singapore.  His quotes are so close to the PAP’s governing principle and philosophy.  Most likely, in Singapore, he will also not subject to the kinds of scrutiny and criticisms as he has in the USA.

If he were in Singapore, he will win comfortably as the main stream media will not question him about his attitude towards the poor, about the education, income and employment etc.  Instead, the MSM will praise him for his ‘big’ sacrifice.  

Free press plays the crucial difference.  Unfortunately, Mitt Romney will most likely not be elected as the next US President.  His American dream seems to be a mission impossible.

But then, who else in Singapore like Mitt Romney will ‘sacrifice’ himself for a betterment of political development here?  Again will there any multi-millionaire in Singapore be interested to stand for election in Singapore?    

This is why Mitt Romney is born in the wrong place.  If he were in Singapore, we welcome foreign talents and multi-millionaires.  Foreign born, no problem, you can still stand for election if you are a citizen.  

In addition, the PAP will ask the main stream media to help Mitt Romney to promote him despite the following controversies:

Not concerning about the very poor

Like the PAP, Mitt will say there are safety nets for the poor.

“I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor — we have a safety net there,” he said. “If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich — they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72297.html#ixzz27BDWjwXC

Education: if you can afford

Like Mitt, if you have money you can go overseas for university education.   

“I think this is a land of opportunity for every single person, every single citizen of this great nation. And I want to make sure that we keep America a place of opportunity, where everyone has a fair shot. They get as much education as they can afford and with their time they’re able to get and if they have a willingness to work hard and the right values, they ought to be able to provide for their family and have a shot of realizing their dreams.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/06/29/afford/

Most don’t pay income tax but hope for free goods

In Singapore, most people don’t pay personal income tax and they are dependent upon government for health care, housing, transport, and even education.

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what.""http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/top-13-quotes-mitt-romneys-leaked-fundraiser-video/story?id=17264969#1

Big sacrifice and low tax rate

Singapore offers one of the lowest personal income taxes in the world to residents and people like Mitt Romney if he joins politics in Singapore, he will be considered as a very big sacrifice.

Mitt Romney paid an effective tax rate of 14.1 percent in 2011, according to a tax return filed on Friday,……Romney's income was $13,696,951 in 2011, and he paid $1,935,708 in taxes. Romney's income for the year was more than 263 times larger than the U.S. median household income of $51,914.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/mitt-romney-tax-returns-released_n_1904242.html

Our MSM will further emphasize about his deduction to show that he is making even more sacrifices.  

The choice to not take the deduction allowed Romney to inflate his tax rate to 14.1 percent. The difference between his charitable giving of more than $4 million and his claimed deductions of $2.25 million increased his tax bill by several hundred thousand dollars, as he paid taxes he didn't have to on nearly two million dollars.(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/21/mitt-romney-tax-return_n_1904573.html)

Low productivity, you are fired

People with low education and low productivity should receive low pay if not fired.

Firing peopleIn January, while making a case for why consumers looking for health insurance would benefit from companies competing for their business, Romney expressed his view in a way that he later admitted would "haunt" him on the campaign trail."I like being able to fire people who provide services to me," Romney told the Nashua Chamber of Commerce in New Hampshire.http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/09/19/romney-speech-blunders.html

Casino – the way to solve problem

Mitt likes betting so he will support the so-called integrated projects in Singapore.

A $10,000 betPrior to winning the Republican nomination in the summer of 2012, Romney took part in a December 2011 debate that included Texas governor and fellow Republican candidate Rick Perry. In a heated exchange, Perry accused Romney of backtracking on a previous statement in which Romney allegedly touted the Massachusetts health-care program he signed as a national model for health care reform.A flustered Romney then made what critics called an outrageous challenge to settle the veracity of Perry's claim."Rick, I'll tell you what: 10,000 bucks. $10,000 bet?" he proposed.Perry declined, responding, "I'm not in the betting business."http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/09/19/romney-speech-blunders.html 
Never understand the difficulties facing jobless people

Like Mitt, the PAP is quite ignorance of problems facing jobless and poor people.

A joke about being jobless
While addressing out-of-work Floridians at a rally in June, Romney attempted a bit of humour: "I should tell my story. I'm also unemployed."
Critics felt this was a bit rich, not to mention disingenuous, coming from a man worth a reported $250 million US.

Conclusion
In Singapore, under the magic hand of the MSM, Mitt Romney will be a person who makes big sacrifice to join the PAP. He is a successful businessman and graduated from Harvard. He cares about the poor, jobless and likes integrated resort projects. Besides having risk experience in investment and betting, he also encourages parents to send their children for education overseas if they can afford.
Of course, Mitt Romney will stress that the government has already have many inclusive safety nets for the poor, for their children’s education, health care, housing, transport and CPF savings.
However, this is a Singapore reality not an American dream. A Mitt similar will win in Singapore but a real Mitt will most likely not be able to realise his American dream in his home country. Blame what – free press! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

对话一定要有共识吗?还是求取多元性来丰富自我?

全国对话喊到现在还一直高喊全国要有共识,尤其是全国对话的结果就是要寻求新加坡人的共识。不然,行动党就会说,我国的政治将会出现分裂,新加坡就变成一个不团结的国家。 全国对话一定要取得共识吗?文明对话的目的难道就是为了取得全国共识吗?如果是共识,那就一定有取舍。是不是说强势的人就领头共识,而落势的就落得一无所有。这不又走回老路,一条行动党独大的旧政治框框吗?看来,行动党对于过去,仍然依依不舍,行动党的共识,就是国家的共识,新加坡人的共识。 对话是要加深双方的了解,尊敬并且互相学习,吸取对方的优点,填补自己的缺点。这就是多元性的好处。然而全国对话的结果,如果只是强求共识,而忽略多元性和不同的意见,甚至否定他人的意见,那么,这个共识,是否具建设性,破坏性,还是分裂性,那就很难说了。 行动党似乎忘记了多元性。文明的对话并不是要把自己的 意见,信仰和理念强加给对方。即使这些意见,信仰和理念都是好的,善的。但是,对方未必会欣赏,未必会接受。因此,对话的结果应该是吸取对方的意见,改进自己的治国方针,然后,交给人民去决定,而这个决定也不过是大多数人的共识,而不可能是全国人民百分百的共识。 (乐观的看,行动党的全国对话,也不过是改进自己的治国方针,通过自己的小圈圈,自我讨论,研究,更新和改良行动党的政治策略,然后,在下一次大选时,拿出来让选民决定。因此,所谓的共识,在全国人民还没有决定前,仍然不是全国大多数人的共识。很可惜,行动党原本应该通过全国对话这个平台,吸收更多对手的意见,不同的观点,将它们纳入自己的政治策略中,然后在大选中让选民选择这个纳入反对意见的新政纲。可惜的是,行动党没有这个雅量,也或许根本看不起反对的意见。因此,它只能企图通过全国对话,硬要说这是全国共识。所以,充其量这只能说是行动党小圈圈的改良版政治策略,绝对不能说是全国共识。) ‘己所不欲,忽施于人’我们不喜欢的,不要强加他人身上。同样的,我们喜欢的,也不可以强加于他人身上。例如,有些人不喜欢吃有些食物,我们却很喜欢吃这类食物,但是,我们要尊重个人的喜好,不要强迫他人接受我们的建议。了解了这点,下一回提供食物时,就会通过多些选择,而不是只提供自己喜欢的食物。这点一般新加坡人都有这个敏感度,我们会了解马来族的要求,尽量避免他们敏感的食物。 为何行动党过去能够了解国人...