Skip to main content

行动党炒作议题策略失效: 失去部长,种族议题,外国干涉,个人攻击, 英康解释不清。 选情告急,试图模糊选民的关注点。

 行动党炒作议题策略失效:

失去部长,种族议题,外国干涉,个人攻击,

英康解释不清。

选情告急,试图模糊选民的关注点。


失去部长组不成政府 - 领导力差,经不起考验,

无能的表现。

种族议题 - 故意挑起种族议题,转移焦点。

外国干涉 - 故意影视反对党候选人被海外操控。

个人攻击 - 恶人先告状,行动党什么时候对反对党仁慈?

英康解释不清 - 逃避责任,顾左右而言他。


行动党抛出的几个课题,几乎每一次大选,都出现。有人批评,这是制造恐慌,在关税大战上,添油加酱,进一步让选民觉得,只有行动党才是救世主,只有获得强大委托,才能做好政府,不需要制衡。


每一次大选,都制造危机感。当然,每一次都顺利过关。难道,选民不会觉得这是狼来了吗?目地就是不让反对党优秀候选人进入国会。够了!够了! 是时候跟行动党说不,NO.

与其担心失去几个部长,

不如努力为民效劳。

与其不愿被批评,

倒不如坦诚面对选民。


如果努力为民服务,根本不用担心部长落选。

如果真心解决民困,根本就不担心部长被批评。

如果没有掩盖事实,就无需躲躲闪闪,把英康真相说出来。




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...